Determining fundamental error in sentencing process
Also stated as: Analyzing structural error arguments under sentencing guidelines
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining fundamental error in sentencing process
- Cited for: Determining errors on the face of the record in sentencing
- Cited for: Determining harmless error in sentencing based on scoresheet accuracy
- Cited for: Determining fundamental error in sentencing policy
- Cited for: Determining harmless error in sentencing based on scoresheet error
- Cited for: Determining harmless error when sentencing scoresheet changes
- Cited for: Determining reviewability of sentencing scoresheet errors
- Cited for: Finding no error despite scoresheet error in sentencing
Ranked by how often Florida courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Florida opinions citing these pages
- Alcantara-Menjivar v. State of Florida, 430 So. 3d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 2026)
- Chang v. State of Florida, 423 So. 3d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025)
- Jules Ducas v. State of Florida, 406 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
- Carissa Parker v. State of Florida, 398 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)
- Edsel A. Brown v. State of Florida, 397 So. 3d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)
- Wellington Gilbert v. State of Florida, 397 So. 3d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
- Carissa Parker v. State of Florida, No. 1D2023-0760 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 30, 2024)
- Jeffery Geske v. State of Florida, 378 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024)
- Felipe Lizano v. State of Florida, 390 So. 3d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
- State of Florida v. Tony Garcia, 346 So. 3d 581 (Fla. 2022)
- Michael D. Spear v. State of Florida, 341 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. 2022)
- L.s. v. State of Florida, 346 So. 3d 42 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)
- Ronald Lee Coleman v. State of Florida, No. 17-3977 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 14, 2020)
- Wilfred Garrard v. State of Florida, No. 18-1301 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 27, 2019)
- Woodrow W. Rose v. State of Florida, 256 So. 3d 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Named doctrine
The doctrine as Florida courts name it, with the cases on each side (State Issue Map).
Nearest issues
- 30 opinions
- 14 opinions
- 12 opinions
- 5 opinions
- 83 opinions
- 133 opinions
- 8 opinions
- 19 opinions
Filed under: Sentencing Review and Judicial Discretion
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law