Legislature's authority over harmless error analysis
Also stated as: Applying harmless-error analysis to constitutional errors
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Legislature's authority over harmless error analysis
- Cited for: Applying harmless-error analysis to constitutional errors
- Cited for: Applying harmless error analysis to constitutional errors
- Cited for: Applying harmless error analysis to statutory element proof
Ranked by how often Florida courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Florida opinions citing these pages
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Michael Jordan Lipp, 423 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
- Nicholas G. Coullias v. State of Florida, 417 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)
- Ralph Waldo Emerson, IV v. State of Florida, 412 So. 3d 917 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)
- Curtis Leroy Sherrod, II v. State of Florida, 397 So. 3d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
- John Sexton v. State of Florida, 402 So. 3d 270 (Fla. 2024)
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Michael Jordan Lipp, No. 2021-2214 (Fla. 3d DCA Mar. 27, 2024)
- State of Florida v. Herbert Leon Manago, Jr., 375 So. 3d 190 (Fla. 2023)
- Kenneth R. Jackson v. State of Florida, 213 So. 3d 754 (Fla. 2017)
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of Florida, 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016)
- Foster v. State, 182 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
- Parker v. State, 124 So. 3d 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
- Sims v. State, 135 So. 3d 1098 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
- Geissler v. State, 90 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
- Special v. Baux, 79 So. 3d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
- Hughes v. State, 36 So. 3d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 9 opinions
- 10 opinions
- 101 opinions
- 7 opinions
- 11 opinions
- 30 opinions
- 76 opinions
- 25 opinions
Filed under: Harmless Error and Evidentiary Review
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law