Determining competency through nunc pro tunc evaluation
Also stated as: Competency Standards and Evaluation Methods
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining competency through nunc pro tunc evaluation
- Cited for: Determining continued competency after initial finding
- Cited for: Determining competency based on written reports alone
- Cited for: Determining commitment when competency is unlikely to return
- Cited for: Determining competency when experts stipulate to competence
- Cited for: Determining adequacy of retrospective competency determination
- Cited for: Determining competency when decisions are unwise
- Cited for: Assessing competency by contact with reality
Ranked by how often Florida courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Florida opinions citing these pages
- William F. Roberts v. State of Florida, No. SC2022-1176 (Fla. June 25, 2026)
- Frye v. State, No. 2D12-6418, 2016 WL 4944084 (Fla. 2d DCA Sept. 16, 2016)
- Mark Anthony Jackson v. State of Florida, 434 So. 3d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)
- Robert Castro v. State of Florida, 428 So. 3d 605 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)
- Abel Navarro v. State of Florida, 416 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025)
- Rukshan Goonewardena Vs State of Florida, 347 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)
- Craig Alan Wall, Sr. v. State of Florida, 326 So. 3d 1065 (Fla. 2021)
- Angel Santiago-Gonzalez v. State of Florida, 301 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 2020)
- Courtney Hines v. State of Florida, 287 So. 3d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
- Jasmine Clarise Little v. State of Florida, No. 17-2611 (Fla. 4th DCA May 8, 2019)
- Veronica Elder v. State of Florida, 268 So. 3d 995 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
- James a. Machin v. State of Florida, No. 17-2787 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 10, 2019)
- Auerbach v. State, 273 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
- William Allen King v. State of Florida, 263 So. 3d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
- Losada v. State, No. 16-1758 (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 26, 2018)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 24 opinions
- 39 opinions
- 54 opinions
- 5 opinions
- 6 opinions
- 41 opinions
- 12 opinions
- 22 opinions
Filed under: Competency; Hearing; Mental
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law