Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
25 issues with Florida opinions1970–2026
- Analyzing harmless error for trial comments on rights77 opinions · 1970–2026
- Applying harmless error analysis to trial errors68 opinions · 2000–2026
- Applying harmless error analysis to comments on silence60 opinions · 1979–2022
- Determining harmless error for discovery violations39 opinions · 1996–2026
- Analyzing cumulative effect of multiple trial errors39 opinions · 1992–2025
- Conducting cumulative harmless error analysis31 opinions · 2009–2025
- Reaffirming the harmless error standard and its application29 opinions · 1982–2026
- Analyzing cumulative effect of multiple harmless errors28 opinions · 2006–2021
- Determining reversible error for procedural violations27 opinions · 1992–2020
- Applying harmless error test to trial errors24 opinions · 1999–2026
- Defining fundamental error and its harmful nature12 opinions · 2001–2026
- Finding improper golden rule arguments as reversible error11 opinions · 1996–2023
- Establishing high burden for fundamental error review11 opinions · 2009–2024
- Defining fundamental error in closing argument review10 opinions · 1996–2026
- Reviewing unpreserved errors for fundamental error8 opinions · 2018–2026
- State implying witness tampering constitutes reversible error6 opinions · 1988–2018
- Determining sufficiency of error without transcript5 opinions · 2004–2024
Counts are Florida courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law