Florida Statute 7.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.32

7.32 Jackson County.—The boundary lines of Jackson County are as follows: Beginning at the point where the state line between the State of Florida and the State of Alabama crosses Holmes Creek; thence southerly down the thread of said creek to the section line in the middle of township five north, range fourteen west; thence east on the section line to the northeast corner of section twenty-four, township five north, range thirteen west; thence south on range line between ranges twelve and thirteen west, to the township line between townships four and five north; thence east on said township line to the middle of range twelve west; thence south on the middle of said range to the middle of township two north, range twelve west; thence east on the middle of township two north, to the thread of the Chipola River; thence northerly up the thread of the Chipola River to the northern boundary line of said township two; thence east on the northern boundary line of township two north, to the thread of the Apalachicola River; thence northward up the thread of said river and the Chattahoochee River to the Alabama line; and thence westward along said state line to the place of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Aug. 12, 1822; s. 3, Dec. 9, 1825; s. 1, Oct. 29, 1828; s. 1, ch. 180, 1847; s. 1, ch. 1954, 1873; s. 1, ch. 2061, 1875; RS 16; s. 1, ch. 4296, 1893; s. 1, ch. 4576, 1897; GS 14; s. 1, ch. 6935, 1915; RGS 16; CGL 18.

F.S. 7.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.32

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.32

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.32.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.32

Total Results: 16

McPherson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-23

Citation: 198 So. 3d 675, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19155, 2015 WL 9311400

Snippet: McPherson’s presumptive sentence was 87.8 months’ prison (7.32 years), with a minimum sentence of 65,85 months

Stacy Sanislo v. Give Kids The World, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-02-12

Citation: 157 So. 3d 256, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 79, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 214, 2015 WL 569119

Snippet: own negligence are disfavored. See Slip Op. at 7, 32; see also Charles Poe Masonry, Inc. v. Spring Lock

Kelley v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-12

Citation: 82 So. 3d 185, 2012 WL 768241, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3856

Snippet: denied postconviction relief in its case number 07-032. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy

River Bridge Corp. v. American Somax Ventures ex rel. American Home Development Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-08-19

Citation: 18 So. 3d 648, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11569, 2009 WL 2516922

Snippet: “proper absorption” rate in Parcel 1A. He arrived at a 7.32% profit rate. RBC objected to the qualifications

Consalvo v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-10-16

Citation: 697 So. 2d 805, 1996 WL 559883

Snippet: illness. [2] Telephone records indicated that at 7:32 p.m. on October 3, 1991 a collect call was made

Lamas v. Lamas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-09-13

Citation: 660 So. 2d 765, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9659, 1995 WL 539680

Snippet: business expenses in the amount of $586 per month, or $7,032 for the 1993 tax year.5 There is simply no showing

Balino v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVE, ETC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-09-18

Citation: 362 So. 2d 21

Snippet: facility (SNF) patient" and specifically Rule 10c-7.32, Florida Administrative Code, setting out those

Hodkin v. Florida Bar

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-03-27

Citation: 293 So. 2d 56, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4189

Snippet: Rule S-103, 32 F.S.A., Ethical Considerations 5-7, 32 F.S.A. and his oath as an attorney. The referee

In Re Florida Workmen's Compensation Rules of Pro.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-11-14

Citation: 285 So. 2d 601, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4246

Snippet: the manner authorized in Florida Appellate Rule 3.7, 32 F.S.A. Appellant shall include his argument on the

Akin v. Harvey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-10-23

Citation: 283 So. 2d 872, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6667

Snippet: accordance with Florida Appellate Rules 3.5, 3.6, and 3.7, 32 F.S.A. Appellants filed a notice of appeal on May

Dade County v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-02-07

Citation: 275 So. 2d 505

Snippet: plaintiff, Pan American World Airways, totalled $7,032,863.71. These "bond revenue properties" (though

The Florida Bar v. Teitelman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-04-05

Citation: 261 So. 2d 140, 68 A.L.R. 3d 959, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3785

Snippet: "make a hardship upon the sellers." (See Canon 7, 32 F.S.A., footnote 2, infra). In this particular case

City of Miami v. Silver

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-01-11

Citation: 257 So. 2d 563

Snippet: (1932); 1 R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning § 7.32 (1968). On March 14, 1966, the City passed Resolution

Dade County v. Deauville Operating Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-09-10

Citation: 156 So. 2d 31

Snippet: improvements, were as follows: (1) Deauville Hotel $7,032,000.00 (2) Casablanca Hotel 1,904,250.00 (3) Sherry

Bowden v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-02-07

Citation: 137 So. 2d 621

Snippet: 287; Seymour v. State, 1913, 66 Fla. 133, 63 So. 7; 32 Fla.Jur., Trial § 17. This case was very ably presented

Hopkins v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1906-06-15

Citation: 52 Fla. 39

Snippet: Augustine at 6:10 P. M., and arrived at Jacksonville at 7:32 P. M., and was numbered 30. The same conductor ran