Florida Statute 7.49 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.49

7.49 Osceola County.—The boundaries of Osceola County are as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of township twenty-five south, range twenty-seven east; thence east on said township line to the northeast corner of township twenty-five south, range thirty-four east; thence south on the range line dividing ranges thirty-four and thirty-five east, to the line dividing townships thirty-two and thirty-three south; thence west on said township line to the west bank of Central and South Florida Flood Control District Canal C-38 (Kissimmee River); thence northerly along said west bank to Lake Kissimmee; thence northerly and westerly along the west shore of Lake Kissimmee to the west bank of Central and South Florida Flood Control District Canal C-37; run thence northerly along said west bank of canal to Lake Hatchineha; thence westerly, northerly and easterly along the west and north shore of Lake Hatchineha to the thread of the stream of Dead River; run thence northerly along the thread of the stream of Dead River, and Reedy Creek to the west shore of Lake Cypress; run thence northerly along said west shore of Lake Cypress to the township line dividing townships twenty-seven and twenty-eight south; thence west on said line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-eight and twenty-nine east; thence north along the range line to the southeast corner of section twelve, township twenty-seven south, range twenty-eight east; thence west along section lines to the southwest corner of section nine, township twenty-seven south, range twenty-eight east; thence north along section lines to the southwest corner of section twenty-one, township twenty-six south, range twenty-eight east; thence northwesterly through respective section and quarter section corners to the southeast corner of township twenty-five south, range twenty-seven east; thence west along township line to the point where the dividing line between ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east intersects the line dividing townships twenty-five and twenty-six south; run thence north on the range line to the point of beginning. The shorelines of Lakes Kissimmee and Hatchineha shall be as physically present unless and until the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund shall establish bulkhead lines along the said lake shores; in which event, the said shorelines shall be the said bulkhead lines to the extent they are so established.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1201, 1861; s. 2, ch. 1998, 1874; s. 2, ch. 3177, 1879; s. 1, ch. 3768, 1887; RS 49; GS 47; s. 1, ch. 7401, 1917; RGS 52; CGL 54; s. 1, ch. 67-592; ss. 27, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 7.49 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.49 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.49

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.49

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.49.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.49

Total Results: 20

Pearson v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-05-18

Citation: 60 So. 3d 1168, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7174, 2011 WL 1877953

Snippet: judgment required the Guarantors to pay $14,627,007.49 to Cat Financial which the Guarantors have timely

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2010-06-07

Snippet: 055(2)(g), Fla. Stat. 17 Id. 18 See Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 07-49 (2007). 19 20 C.J.S. Counties s. 193; Jones v. PinellasCounty

Vargas v. Enterprise Leasing Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-10-31

Citation: 993 So. 2d 614, 2008 WL 4756388

Snippet: exception would swallow the rule. 540 F.3d at 1248. [7] 49 U.S.C. § 30106 (2005). I refer to the two subsections

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-11-02

Citation: 794 So. 2d 457, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2556, 2000 WL 1637548

Snippet: petitioner’s arrest on the (4)27 day of .■■■— . ,7 49^_(date)_, by _(arresting agency)_, for-(charges)-

In Re Senate Joint Resolution 2G

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-05-13

Citation: 597 So. 2d 276, 1992 WL 97994

Snippet: [21] Arnett Girardeau, 1982-90, from District 7 (49% black under 1980 census, and 48% under 1990). [22]

United Health, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-04-11

Citation: 578 So. 2d 775, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3804, 1991 WL 54136

Snippet: reimbursement for this item on the authority of Rule 10C-7.049(3)(b)3., Florida Administrative Code, which provided

Lightsey v. Williams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-06-10

Citation: 526 So. 2d 764, 1988 WL 59578

Snippet: DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Sections 7.49 and 7.53, Florida Statutes (1987). [2] Section

BD. OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL v. Walker Ranch

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-08-21

Citation: 496 So. 2d 153

Snippet: description of each county's boundaries. Both section 7.49, Florida Statutes (1985), which describes Osceola

Am. Bankers Life v. Williams, Salomon, Kanner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-04-28

Citation: 399 So. 2d 365

Snippet: mortgage, $545,432.52, appellee's second mortgage, $93,007.49, appellant's third mortgage, $27,943.79.

Shifrin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-05-10

Citation: 210 So. 2d 18

Snippet: 120 So. 355 (1929); and Fudge v. State, 57 Fla. 7, 49 So. 128 (1909). The Supreme Court therein generally

State v. Fabian

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-11-20

Citation: 97 So. 2d 178

Snippet: Criminal Procedure Act. Fudge v. State, 57 Fla. 7, 49 So. 128, 17 Ann.Cas. 919. “(1, 2) Alabama has a

State v. City of Pensacola

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1949-05-20

Citation: 40 So. 2d 569, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1401

Snippet: City of Pensacola adopted emergency ordinance No. 7-49 authorizing the issuance of $1,700,000 of paving

Ritter v. Sinclair

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-03-10

Citation: 17 So. 2d 97, 154 Fla. 272, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 677

Snippet: Criminal Procedure Act. Fudge v. State,57 Fla. 7, 49 So. 128. Alabama has a similar statutory form and

Brown v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-05-04

Citation: 13 So. 2d 458, 152 Fla. 853, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 1047

Snippet: very serious question. See Fudge v. State, 57 Fla. 7, 49 So. 128, 17 Ann. Cas. 919; State ex rel. Reed v

West v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-02-06

Citation: 6 So. 2d 7, 149 Fla. 436, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 800

Snippet: very serious question. See Fudge v. State, 57 Fla. 7, 49 So. 128, 17 Ann. Cas. 919; State ex rel. Reed v

Hall v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-03-14

Citation: 187 So. 392, 136 Fla. 644, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1591

Snippet: Wharton's Crim. Law, 12th Ed., pp. 1815, 1830; 57 Fla. 7,49 So. 128, 17 Ann. Cas. 919; Note in 17 Ann. Cas.

Drawdy v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-09-25

Citation: 123 So. 913, 98 Fla. 473

Snippet: this Court in the case of Fudge v. State, 57 Fla. 7, 49 So. R. 128, and cases there cited. For the reasons

State Ex Rel. Reed v. Blitch

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-02-22

Citation: 120 So. 355, 97 Fla. 260

Snippet: Amos, supra. *Page 264 In Fudge v. State, 57 Fla. 7, 49 So. R. 128, this Court say: It is necessary

Settles v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1918-02-21

Citation: 75 Fla. 296, 78 So. 287

Snippet: sworn according to law. See Fudge v. State, 57 Fla. 7, 49 South. Rep. 128; Markey v. State, 47 Fla. 38, 37

Jarvis v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-03-13

Citation: 73 Fla. 635, 74 So. 794

Snippet: 38, 37 South. Rep. 53; Fudge v. State, 57 Fla. 7, 49 South. Rep. 128, 17 Ann. Cas. 919. We are of the