Florida Statute 7.52 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.52

7.52 Pinellas County.—The boundary lines of Pinellas County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the line dividing townships twenty-six and twenty-seven south if projected in a westerly direction intersects with the western boundary of the jurisdictional waters of the State of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico; thence east on said line to the northeast corner of section one in township twenty-seven south, range sixteen east; thence south to the shore of old Tampa Bay; thence in a southerly direction through the middle waters of old Tampa Bay and Tampa Bay, to a point in Tampa Bay due east of the north shore of Mullet Key; thence due west to a point due north of a point 100 yards due east from the easternmost point of Mullet Key; thence in a line 100 yards from the shoreline around the southern portion of Mullet Key to a point 100 yards west of the northernmost shore of Mullet Key; thence west to a point where such line intersects the western boundary of the jurisdictional waters of the State of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico and northward, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to point of beginning; provided however that nothing herein contained shall now or at any time hereafter in any manner whatsoever repeal, amend, change or disturb in any manner whatsoever the apportionment, allotment, allocation, basis of computation, or other formula wherein and whereby the participation in the gas tax by both counties hereto under and by virtue of ss. 206.41 and 206.47 or any law hereafter enacted, is changed so that Hillsborough County would receive a lesser amount and Pinellas County would receive a greater amount of such gas funds or tax by reason of the change of the boundary line herein authorized.

History.—s. 1, ch. 6247, 1911; RGS 50; CGL 52; s. 1, ch. 19058, 1939; s. 1, ch. 67-601; ss. 1, 2, ch. 70-995.

F.S. 7.52 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.52 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.52

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.52

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.52.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.52

Total Results: 13

Amos Moorer v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-23

Snippet: County about 6:14 p.m., was around the crime scene at 7:52 p.m., was moving away from the scene at 7:55 p.m

Vision Palm Springs v. Coscan Palm Springs

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-27

Citation: 272 So. 3d 441

Snippet: have a settlement.” • July 9, 2015 at 7:52 a.m. – Vision’s counsel replied stating: “I disagree

GEICO Indem. Co. v. Perez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-20

Citation: 260 So. 3d 342

Snippet: address to the Perezes' daughter's email address. At 7:52 p.m., an online GEICO account was created using

GEICO Indem. Co. v. Perez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-20

Citation: 260 So. 3d 342

Snippet: address to the Perezes' daughter's email address. At 7:52 p.m., an online GEICO account was created using

Michelle Bork v. Jeff D. Bork

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-09-06

Citation: 197 So. 3d 1290, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13347

Snippet: found that the former husband’s net income was $7,052.88 based on his June 23, 2015, amended Financial

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-02

Citation: 179 So. 3d 258, 2015 WL 7753054

Snippet: 2010 CD 67.18 51.7 52.7 40.5 43.3 62.9 62.5 49.8

Florida Medical & Injury Center, Inc. v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-01-22

Citation: 29 So. 3d 329, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 420

Snippet: Clinic, P.A. v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., No. 07-52-AP (Fla. 18th Cir.Ct. Jan. 15, 2009); United Auto

Gilbert v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-02

Citation: 868 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4297, 2004 WL 689362

Snippet: Gilbert’s cell phone number at 7:46 a.m., 7:48 a.m., 7:52 a.m, and 7:54 a.m. The testimony that is the subject

Vasquez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-11-20

Citation: 830 So. 2d 929, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17144, 2002 WL 31557651

Snippet: videotape showing activity at the front area from 7:52 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on August 7, 2000 was admitted

Harris v. State, Dept. of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-06-18

Citation: 563 So. 2d 97, 1990 WL 43141

Snippet: Chicago Union Traction Co., 207 U.S. 20, 28 S.Ct. 7, 52 L.Ed. 78 (1907); Arundel Corp. v. Sproul, 136 Fla

Ray v. Rotella

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-12-22

Citation: 425 So. 2d 94, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22000

Snippet: the mortgage on October, 1978, and an additional $7,052.72 as a result of a modification of the mortgage

Morales v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-12-15

Citation: 407 So. 2d 321

Snippet: 431 U.S. 606, 611 n. 7, 97 S.Ct. 1972, 1976 n. 7, 52 L.Ed.2d 617 (1977); United States v. Santana, 427

Fletcher v. Florida Publishing Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-09-10

Citation: 319 So. 2d 100

Snippet: § 167, Comment d.; 52 Am.Jur., Trespass, § 39. [7] 52 Am.Jur., Trespass, § 39 and cases there cited.