Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
(including 2025 Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 10
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-02-27
Snippet: 3.12 (Verdict), 8.26 (Sexual Cyberharassment), 11.21 (Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors by
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-15
Citation: 257 So. 3d 370
Snippet: 11.18 (Sexual Misconduct by a Psychotherapist), 11.21 (Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors by Electronic
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-27
Citation: 256 So. 3d 766
Snippet: , 27 Mental & Physical Disability L. Rep. 11, 21 n.29 (2003). The AAIDD, in its amicus brief
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-09
Citation: 220 So. 3d 1133
Snippet: 700 (Fla. 2012); Johnston v. State, 27 So. 3d 11, 21 (Fla. 2010). Accordingly, summary denial of this
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-17
Citation: 200 So. 3d 685
Snippet: discovered evidence. See Johnston v. State, 27 So.3d 11, 21-23 (Fla.2010) (finding 2009 NAS report was not
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-04-30
Citation: 163 So. 3d 478, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 221, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 927, 2015 WL 1932145
Snippet: Pornography by Electronic Device or Equipment); 11.21 (Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors by Electronic
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-10-17
Citation: 132 So. 3d 40, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 756, 2013 WL 5659482, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2287
Snippet: probably be acquitted. Johnston v. State, 27 So.3d 11, 21 (Fla.2010) (citing Jones v. State, 709 So.2d 512
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-09-07
Citation: 773 So. 2d 34, 2000 WL 1259723
Snippet: Claims (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (11), (21), (26) are procedurally barred because they should
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-10-07
Citation: 625 So. 2d 463, 30 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1522, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 525, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1630, 1993 WL 391614
Snippet: mark used by others on similar products). Id. § 11.21-.22. We approve these tests as appropriate for use
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-12-18
Citation: 217 So. 2d 108, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 1984
Snippet: Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule, Canons 11, 21, and 29, of the Canons of Professional Ethics,
Added to database: 2025-08-29 18:46:19