Florida Statute 15.032 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 15
SECRETARY OF STATE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 15.032

15.032 State beverage.—The juice obtained from mature oranges of the species Citrus sinensis and hybrids thereof is hereby adopted as the official beverage of Florida.

History.—s. 1, ch. 67-4.

F.S. 15.032 on Google Scholar

F.S. 15.032 on Casetext

Amendments to 15.032

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 15.032

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 15.032.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 15.032

Total Results: 20

Sewell v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-27

Citation: 245 So. 3d 822

Snippet: discussion infra at *14-15. 32 cannot find a lack of duty

In Re: Certification of Need for Additional Judges

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-12-15

Citation: 206 So. 3d 22, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 605, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2681

Snippet: 30 . Id. 31 . Id. at 15. 32 . Id. at 15-16. 33 .

Crastvell Trading Ltd. v. Marengere

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-06-20

Citation: 90 So. 3d 349, 2012 WL 2327749, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9938

Snippet: 407 U.S. 1, 8-9, 13, 92 S.Ct. 1907, 1912-13, 1914-15, 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972), that freely negotiated contracts

Mathews v. Ranger Insurance Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-06-13

Citation: 281 So. 2d 345, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 5012

Snippet: supra 273 So.2d at 113; 1 Couch on Insurance 2d, § 15:32, p. 704. The ambiguity presented by "Exclusion No

Hydraulic Eq. Sys. & F., Inc. v. Penn. Mmi Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-04-24

Citation: 277 So. 2d 53

Snippet: will usually govern. 1 Couch on Insurance 2d, § 15:32, p. 703; 13 Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice,

State ex rel. Keegan v. Sandstrom

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-04-16

Citation: 276 So. 2d 472, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4600

Snippet: Fla., 90 So.2d 308. See Florida Appellate Rule 6.15, 32 F.S.A. Under the facts here presented I believe

Hedden v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-03-14

Citation: 275 So. 2d 52

Snippet: Younghans v. State, Fla. 1956, 90 So.2d 308; F.A.R. 6.15, 32 F.S.A. (providing that application for bail pending

Joseph Uram Jewelers, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-12-12

Citation: 273 So. 2d 111

Snippet: will usually govern. 1 Couch on Insurance 2d, § 15:32, p. 703; 13 Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice,

Turner v. Genung

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-10-04

Citation: 268 So. 2d 394, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5987

Snippet: pending appeal under the provisions of F.A.R. 6.15, 32 F.S.A. This matter is scheduled for hearing at

Donaldson v. Sack

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-07-17

Citation: 265 So. 2d 499

Snippet: rule is of course different. F.A.R. 3.14 and 3.15, 32 F.S.A.) [2] Fla. Stat. § 26.53, F.S.A., is to

Wells v. Wainwright

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-01-21

Citation: 260 So. 2d 196, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3875

Snippet: Younghans v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 308; F.A.R. 6.15, 32 F.S.A. (providing that application for bail pending

Dawkins v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-01-10

Citation: 205 So. 2d 691, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 6125

Snippet: appellants in contempt. Florida Appellate Rule 6.15, 32 F.S.A. sets forth the standards to be used by a

Furnell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-12-01

Citation: 206 So. 2d 23, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423

Snippet: that probation should be revoked. Canon of Ethics #15, 32 F.S.A., provides : “ * * * The lawyer owes ‘entire

Morton v. Harrington

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-10-11

Citation: 190 So. 2d 625

Snippet: Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 420; 5 Fla.Jur., Brokers, §§ 15, 32. The final judgment here under review is hereby

Turner v. State Ex Rel. Gruver

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-10-27

Citation: 168 So. 2d 192

Snippet: 15-24.[1] A catch-all provision appearing as § 15-32 makes violation of any of the preceding 31 sections

Henderson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-12-16

Citation: 185 So. 625, 135 Fla. 548, 120 A.L.R. 742, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1596

Snippet: violation of that agreement. State v. Graham, 41 N.J.L. 15; 32 Am. Rep. 174; People v. Peter, 48 Cal. 251; People

Wilson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-10-18

Citation: 184 So. 31, 134 Fla. 390, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1119

Snippet: violation of that agreement. State v. Graham, 41 N.J.L. 15; 32 Am. Rep. 174; People v. Peter, 48 Cal. 251; People

In Re W. Marvin Clifton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-06-04

Citation: 155 So. 324, 115 Fla. 168

Snippet: Re-Corporative Law Co., 198 N.Y. 479, 92 N.E. Rep. 15, 32 L.R.A. (N.S.) 55. In that case Judge VANN said:

Borson v. Lisenby

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-04-04

Citation: 156 So. 10, 115 Fla. 333

Snippet: stockholders Depositors Bank of Crescent City, 12/15/32. K. Borson ........................ $1,000

Ingram v. Prescott

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-07-07

Citation: 149 So. 369, 111 Fla. 320, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1975

Snippet: violation of that agreement. State v. Graham,41 N.J.L. 15; 32 Am. Rep. 174; People v. Peter, 48 Cal. 251; People