Florida Statute 16.016 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 16.016

16.016 Payment of per diem, mileage, and other expense.—Whenever the Department of Legal Affairs is called upon to represent any administrative agency or regulatory board, the agency or regulatory board so represented shall pay the per diem, mileage, and other reasonable expense of the representative of such department.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-522; ss. 11, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 5, ch. 79-36.

Note.—Former s. 455.07.

F.S. 16.016 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.016 on Casetext

Amendments to 16.016

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 16.016

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 16.016.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 16.016

Total Results: 20

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Adult Personal Use of Marijuana

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-01

Snippet: constitutional function, as a restraint. 16 16. Cf. McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S.

PERLMAN, BAJANDAS, YEVOLI & ALBRIGHT, P.L. v. ATLAS HOLDING CORPORATION

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-30

Snippet: BellSouth Advert. & Publ’g Corp., 664 So. 2d 16, 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)). A denial of due process likewise

GEORGE GOMEZ v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-01-25

Snippet: BellSouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp., 664 So. 2d 16, 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). In so interpreting the order

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BEST MEDICAL TREATMENTS, INC., etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-01-04

Snippet: BellSouth Advert. & Publ’g Corp., 664 So. 2d 16, 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). By contrast, Best

ALBERTO YORDANO CORREDOR v. GEORGE NICHOLS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-07-06

Snippet: Bellsouth Advert. & Publ’g Corp., 664 So. 2d 16, 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). While a receiver is entitled

JERMAINE CLARINGTON v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-12-02

Snippet: or violate his constitutional right to counsel. 16 16 We also decline at this time to address the claim

Tina Lasonya Brown v. State of Florida & Tina Lasonya Brown v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-08-27

Snippet: error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.16 16. In Mosley v. State, 209 So. 3d 1248, 1283 (Fla

SCF, Inc. v. Florida Thoroughbred Breeders' Association, Inc. etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-16

Citation: 227 So. 3d 770

Snippet: Equine Lien Laws, Fla. B.J., November 2014, at 16, 16 (footnote omitted). 3 . See About

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-02

Citation: 179 So. 3d 258, 2015 WL 7753054

Snippet: conclusions from was suspect.” Trial Court Order at 16-16. For instance, of the ten elections Professor Liu

Marvin Cannon v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-09-24

Citation: 180 So. 3d 1023, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 509, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2033

Snippet: evidence, and Cannon is not entitled to relief.16 16. We also affirm the conviction for arson as

Amerisure Mutual Insurance Co. v. Florida Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' Compensation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-01-01

Citation: 156 So. 3d 520, 2015 WL 46515

Snippet: outside the agency issuing the memorandum.” § 120.52(16), (16)(a). See State Bd. of Admin. v. Huberty

Fish Tale Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nice

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-02-01

Citation: 106 So. 3d 57, 2013 A.M.C. 1686, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1463, 2013 WL 399143

Snippet: case. See Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Lugo, 614 So.2d 16, 16-17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Steak Enters., Inc. v. Claus

Williams v. City of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-04-25

Citation: 87 So. 3d 91, 2012 WL 1414843, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6377

Snippet: remedy is necessary. (Ord. No. 8977, § 2 (rule 16 (16.1, 16.2)), 7-24-79; Code 1980, § 40-103) .Williams

Curry v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-06-15

Citation: 64 So. 3d 152, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8946, 2011 WL 2341395

Snippet: and as we did in Del Valle v. State, 52 So.3d 16, 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), we reverse Curry’s murder conviction

State v. Fernandez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-01-22

Citation: 36 So. 3d 120, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 407, 2010 WL 199301

Snippet: time on appeal. See Hicks v. State, 929 So.2d 13, 16, 16 n. 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (noting that the term standing

Kuvin v. City of Coral Gables

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-08-22

Citation: 62 So. 3d 604, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13015, 2007 WL 7548631

Snippet: The Law of Zoning and Planning, §§ 16:7, 16:13-16:16, 16:19 (4th ed. Westlaw database updated Apr. 2007)

Montoure v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-07-29

Citation: 880 So. 2d 793, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 2004 WL 1685245

Snippet: included Appellant’s conviction for violation of Title 16, 16-15-140 of the South Carolina Code. The trial court

Winkler v. Moore

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-25

Citation: 831 So. 2d 63, 2002 WL 717819

Snippet: 25(II) 16 16 16 08/31/1993

Scheman-Gonzalez v. Saber Mfg. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-10

Citation: 816 So. 2d 1133, 2002 WL 530525

Snippet: the factual background testimony regarding the 16/16.5 inch tire/rim mismatch phenomenon, a fact which

State v. Dozier

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-09

Citation: 675 So. 2d 110, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 199, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 772, 1996 WL 234244

Snippet: assignments at issue. Wild v. Dozier, 672 So.2d 16, 16-18 (Fla.1996). Regardless, we also upheld the judicial