Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 17.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 17.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 17.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 17.09
17.09 Application for warrants for salaries.All public officers who are entitled to salaries in this state, shall make their application for warrants in writing, stating for what terms and the amount they claim, which written application shall be filed by the Chief Financial Officer as vouchers for the warrants issued thereupon.
History.s. 1, ch. 1567, 1866; RS 101; GS 105; RGS 118; CGL 148; s. 26, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.09.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.09

Total Results: 20

O.H. v. AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-11-24

Snippet: the effective date.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 65G-4.017(9). 6

GIANCARLO ANTHONY CAMERON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-07-12

Snippet: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GIANCARLO ANTHONY CAMERON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-0009 [July 12, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes

J.B. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-07-05

Snippet: applicable here. Id. at 17. 9 In doing so, the Court

D. T. W. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-18

Snippet: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT D.T.W., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms - Form 12.961

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-14

Snippet: Contempt/Enforcement (12/17) -9-

State ex rel. J.M.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-01-28

Citation: 144 So. 3d 853, 2014 WL 340999

Snippet: described in In re: Warner, 2005-1303, p. (La.4/17/09); 21 So.3d 218, 253, to determine whether a statute

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report 2010-05

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-02-09

Citation: 87 So. 3d 679, 2012 WL 399879

Snippet: light in such taking. Definitions. Take § 37^.001(17)9.101(38), Fla. Stat. “Take” shall include taking

Brooks v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-02-23

Citation: 54 So. 3d 1069, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2254, 2011 WL 611847

Snippet: overruled appellant’s objection and sentenced him to 17.9 years in prison, followed by fifteen years of sex

Shores v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-06-30

Citation: 15 So. 3d 697, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8506, 2009 WL 1856045

Snippet: range of 128.9 months (10.74 years) to 214.8 months (17.9 years). At the hearing, the parties agreed the proper

Trumbull Insurance Co. v. Wolentarski

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-02-04

Citation: 2 So. 3d 1050, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 761, 2009 WL 249203

Snippet: this astounding number of hours—which amounts to 17.9 eight-hour work days, or over three full five-day

Doctors Co. v. State, Dept. of Ins.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-09-13

Citation: 940 So. 2d 466

Snippet: judgment awarding the Department of Financial Services $17.9 million in damages and prejudgment interest in a

State v. Garcia

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-28

Citation: 935 So. 2d 542

Snippet: and that the tests were conducted at 17:07 and 17:09, respectively. The Complaint/Arrest Affidavit, however

Amendments Regulating Bar-Advertising

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-12-17

Citation: 762 So. 2d 392, 1999 WL 1289031

Snippet: purchase a law practice in accordance with rule 4-1.17. (9) Language of Required Statements. Any words or

Cauble v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-09-10

Citation: 742 So. 2d 422, 1999 WL 770680

Snippet: imposed. Since his recommended guidelines sentence was 17.9 years, section 921.001(5) did not apply. Cauble's

Gormley v. GTE Products Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-10-10

Citation: 587 So. 2d 455, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 655, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1749, 1991 WL 201537

Snippet: collateral sources, upon proper objection. Id. at 17-9 — 17-10. The collateral source evidentiary rule

Laberge v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-05-07

Citation: 508 So. 2d 416, 40 Educ. L. Rep. 1078

Snippet: departures, upward and downward, fall into the peripheral 17.9 percent. In considering whether emotional harm is

Manatee County v. State, Department of Environmental Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-09

Citation: 429 So. 2d 360, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18784

Snippet: construction permit pursuant to Fla.Admin.Code Rule 17-9; b. A dredge and fill permit pursuant to Fla.Admin

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-04-28

Snippet: enlarge the secretary's powers. Neither does s. 20.17(9), F.S. Thus, s. 20.17, F.S., as amended, does not

Gaer v. Gaer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-10-27

Citation: 168 So. 2d 789

Snippet: 2d 671; Lindley v. Lindley, Fla. 1955, 84 So.2d 17. [9] Kanter v. Kanter, Fla. 1949, 38 So.2d 685; Rogoff

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Walker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-06-25

Citation: 113 So. 2d 420, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2612

Snippet: Railroad Company v. Richardson, 117 Fla. 10, 157 So. 17. [9] Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Bailey