CopyCited 493 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 80, 2010 WL 6761
jurors' affidavits were inadmissible under O.C.G.A. § 17-9-41 because the affidavits sought to impeach the
0 red5 yellow431 green11 procedural
Called into doubtKennon (2021)phrase: "cast doubt on"
Cited "but see"Ellison (2020)phrase: "but see"
CopyCited 84 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23420, 2002 WL 31500892
sustain but not to impeach their verdict.” O.C.G.A. § 17-9-41. Moreover, the affidavits are irrelevant because
0 red0 yellow84 green3 procedural
Cited as authorityPerez-Diaz (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityShedd (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
the last gubernatorial election. See Ala. Code § 17-9-3(a)(3). There were only about four months between
0 red0 yellow14 green0 procedural
CopyCited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 60 P.U.R.3d 278, 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10074, 1965 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71, 446
See 49 U.S.C. § 17(9); 28 U.S.C. § 2321. [2] See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2322, 2323; 49 U.S.C. § 17(9). [3] See 28
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2014 WL 1717007, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8283
otherwise. See Ga. Code § 9-10-9 (repealed 2013); id. § 17-9-41 (repealed 2013); id. § 24-6-606. Georgia law
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24004
returning officer for each precinct") and with section 17-9-23 which provides that "The election officers
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCoggin (2003)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityCoggin (2003)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWerme (1995)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8049, 1963 WL 110930
§ 1009, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398 and 2201, and § 17(9) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. §' 17(9)
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBanks (1968)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityChoate (1967)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
returning officer for each precinct”) and with section 17-9-23 which provides that “The election officers
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCoggin (2002)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
legislature as House Bill 19 and codified at Ala. Code § 17-9-30. The voter ID law took effect in June 2014
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12964
adjudication under Section 17(9) of the Interstate Commerce Act, Title 49, U.S.C., Section 17(9). We think,
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
2011 Photo Voter Identification Law, Ala. Code § 17-9-30 (“photo ID law”2). GBM, 992 F.3d at 1304–05
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
which the candidate seeks to qualify.” Ala. Code. § 17-9-3(a)(3). In Swanson v. Worley,
490 F.3d 894 (11th
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
legislature as House Bill 19 and codified at Ala. Code § 17-9-30. The voter ID law took effect in June 2014
1 red1 yellow28 green0 procedural
DisapprovedDEKKER (2023)phrase: "disapproving"
Cited as authorityRissling (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
