Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-10T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: State also concedes that the $342.86 fine and $17.14 surcharge must be stricken because the trial court…section 775.083, Florida Statutes, and the related $17.14 surcharge imposed pursuant to section 938.04, Florida
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-08-13T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: 775.083, Florida Statutes, and a surcharge of $17.14 under section 938.04, Florida Statutes. Because
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-06-18T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 250 So. 3d 178
Snippet: pursuant to section 775.083, as well as a related $17.14 surcharge pursuant to section 938.04. Because the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-18T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: 17 14-3114 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-18T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: 17 14-3114 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-08-16T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 196 So. 3d 1287, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12354
Snippet: pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes, and a $17.14 surcharge pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-04-06T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: 16 17 14-2410 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-03-20T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 187 So. 3d 324
Snippet: pursuant to section 775.083 and a surcharge of $17.14 pursuant to section 938.04. However, at sentencing
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-16T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 193 So. 3d 902, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18765
Snippet: 17 14-2863 & 14-1817 District Court of Appeal
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-11-07T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: 17 14-0518 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-02-04T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 163 So. 3d 518, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1398, 2015 WL 445369
Snippet: 17 14-0832 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-02-20T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 948 So. 2d 988
Snippet: Department of Corrections reports that up to 17% or 14,345 of Florida's state prison inmates have
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-02-01T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 752 So. 2d 42
Snippet: application, the design high water elevation is 17.14, while the top of the berm is only 17.00. (d) With
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1997-10-20T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 701 So. 2d 76
Snippet: as a method of execution). [13] See infra note 17. [14] See generally Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-09-03T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 698 So. 2d 912
Snippet: FDLE/ICP Form 14, see Fla. Admin. Code R. 11D8.017(14), the form which the state sought to introduce.
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-02-20T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 593 So. 2d 1212
Snippet: years. They had three children, nineteen, seventeen, and fourteen years of age. The husband was employed
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-12-12T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 554 So. 2d 17, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2879, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7099, 1989 WL 149647
Snippet: Baskin, Cope, Ferguson 12 December 1989 554 So. 2d 17, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2879, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7099,
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-11-29T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 552 So. 2d 1188
Snippet: , not including the car loan. Her liabilities ($17,014.20) exceed her assets ($11,402.00), and her largest
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-03-01T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 539 So. 2d 17, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 575, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 1989 WL 24676
Snippet: Gunther, Letts, Stone 1 March 1989 539 So. 2d 17, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 575, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 1989
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-03-19T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 484 So. 2d 1378, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 708, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6979
Snippet: The motion passed by a vote of either 16 to 15,17 to 14, or possibly 18 to 13, and Cutlip accepted return