Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-01
Snippet: ’ ” (quoting United States v. Raines, 362 U.S. 17, 22 (1960))). III
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-04
Snippet: (2004) (quoting United States v. Raines, 362 U.S. 17, 22 (1960)). The “delicate power” of judicial review
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-01-27
Snippet: Criminal Cases - Reports No. 2005-2, 22 So. 3d 17, 22 (Fla. 2009) (“As for defining the term ‘mental
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-10-16
Snippet: double jeopardy. See Gordon v. State, 780 So. 2d 17, 22 (Fla. 2001) (no double jeopardy violation for convictions
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-12
Citation: 254 So. 3d 1007
Snippet: equality. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 22 (1993). To show interference with one’s
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-05
Citation: 251 So. 3d 811
Snippet: Instr. in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2005-2 , 22 So.3d 17, 22, 35 (Fla. 2009) ; Davis , 207 So.3d at 155 (penalty
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-01
Snippet: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA GEORGETTE LUNDQUIST, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D17-22 LEE COUNTY AND RH VENTURE II, LLC; RH VENTURE III; AND GREENPOINTE COMMUNITIES, LLC,
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-08-26
Citation: 173 So. 3d 1099, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12708, 2015 WL 5023000
Snippet: generally Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 1, 17, 22 (Am. Law Inst. 1981). The two relationships
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-11-15
Citation: 111 So. 3d 810, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 703, 2012 WL 5514368, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2357
Snippet: in Criminal Cases — Report No. 2005-2, 22 So.3d 17, 22 (Fla.2009)). Clearly, the prosecutor should have
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-17
Citation: 98 So. 3d 768, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18071, 2012 WL 4899028
Snippet: scoresheet showed a recommended guidelines sentence of 17-22 years in prison. The state, however, requested that
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-12-01
Citation: 82 So. 3d 31, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 705, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2796, 2011 WL 5984445
Snippet: Instr. in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2005-2, 22 So.3d 17, 22 (Fla.2009) (rejecting a proposed amendment stating
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-09-07
Citation: 70 So. 3d 700, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14106, 2011 WL 3903163
Snippet: criminal." United States v. Felder, 572 F.Supp. 17, 22 (E.D.Pa.1983). The evidence used to corroborate
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-03
Citation: 42 So. 3d 204, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 323, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 854, 2010 WL 2195709
Snippet: in Criminal Cases — Report No. 2005-2, 22 So.3d 17, 22 (Fla.2009) (adopting the "amendment stating that
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-05-06
Citation: 41 So. 3d 857, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 239, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 687, 2010 WL 1791142
Snippet: in Criminal Cases — Report No. 2005-2, 22 So.3d 17, 22 (Fla.2009) (adopting the “amendment stating that
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-11
Citation: 31 So. 3d 733, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 159, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 358, 2010 WL 813677
Snippet: in Criminal Cases — Report No. 2005-2, 22 So.3d 17, 22 (Fla.2009) (adopting the "amendment stating that
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-12-30
Citation: 24 So. 3d 743, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20385, 2009 WL 5125141
Snippet: 20, and 21. [3] Claims 8(a) through 10, 13, 14, 17, 22, and 23. [4] Claims 11, 12, 15, and 18. [5] Claim
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-03-29
Citation: 927 So. 2d 34, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4385, 2006 WL 782448
Snippet: Marine Fisheries Comm’n v. Pringle, 736 So.2d 17, 22 n. 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). But such a challenge
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-04-20
Citation: 899 So. 2d 1257, 2005 WL 906260
Snippet: It provided a recommended sentencing range of 17-22 years, and a permitted range of 12-27 years. In
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-09-19
Citation: 794 So. 2d 719, 2001 WL 1093029
Snippet: sentencing hearing. The recommended sentence here was 17-22 years and the permitted range was 12-27 years. The
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-11-22
Citation: 745 So. 2d 487
Snippet: Marine Fisheries Commission v. Pringle, 736 So.2d 17, 22, n. 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Communications Workers