Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 17.30 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 17.30 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 17.30

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 17.30
17.30 Dissemination of information.The Chief Financial Officer may disseminate, in any form or manner he or she considers appropriate, information regarding the Chief Financial Officer’s official duties.
History.s. 8, ch. 83-132; s. 66, ch. 95-147; s. 42, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.30 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.30 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.30


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.30
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.30.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.30

Total Results: 20

Sean Alonzo Bush v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-05-14

Snippet: would never recover.” Hayward v. State, 24 So. 3d 17, 30 (Fla. 2009) (quoting Henry v. State, 613 So. 2d

George v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-07-05

Citation: 251 So. 3d 262

Snippet: would never recover.” Hayward v. State, 24 So. 3d 17, 30 (Fla. 2009) (quoting Henry v. State, 613 So. 2d

Tamario Dilworth v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-24

Snippet: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA TAMARIO DILWORTH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D17-30 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed August 9

Williams v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-06-05

Citation: 167 So. 3d 483, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8566, 2015 WL 3511222

Snippet: (1980) (quoting Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, 412 U.S. 17, 30, 93 S.Ct. 1977, 36 L.Ed.2d 714 (1973)). *487The

Jackson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-09-19

Citation: 127 So. 3d 447, 2013 WL 5269865

Snippet: in Charleston, South Carolina; and (3) section 17-30-80 of the South Carolina Code titled “Interception

Cardenas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-03

Citation: 49 So. 3d 322, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18353, 2010 WL 4909263

Snippet: statement was made. Hayward v. State, 24 So.3d 17, 30-31 (Fla.2009) (explaining that “the absence of

Jackson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-09-24

Citation: 18 So. 3d 1016, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 547, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1578, 2009 WL 3029668

Snippet: See ch. 934, Fla. Stat. (2005); S.C.Code Ann. § 17-30-10 (Supp.2007). In State v. Smith, 641 So.2d 849

FIRST PROFESSIONAL INS. CO. v. McKinney

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-12-17

Citation: 973 So. 2d 510, 2007 WL 4372744

Snippet: insured on Dr. Esfahani's policy for the dates March 17, 30, and 31, 2000. In correspondence sent by facsimile

Bishop v. Bishop

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-11-14

Citation: 858 So. 2d 1234, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17433, 2003 WL 22681670

Snippet: 00/100 ($550.00) dollars per week, and is set at 17.30% of Respondent’s gross income. Respondent shall

City of W. Palm Beach v. Bd. of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-06-10

Citation: 714 So. 2d 1060

Snippet: held that a landowner had permanently improved 17.30 acres of submerged lands within the meaning of the

Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-03-26

Citation: 466 So. 2d 389, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 788, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13172

Snippet: Trust Fund for the issuance of a disclaimer to 17.30 acres of submerged lands in the St. Johns River

Jacksonville v. DEPT. OF NAT. RES.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-03-26

Citation: 466 So. 2d 389

Snippet: Trust Fund for the issuance of a disclaimer to 17.30 acres of submerged lands in the St. Johns River

Helmick v. Helmick

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-08

Citation: 436 So. 2d 1122

Snippet: (1910) (alimony). [14] Sistare, 218 U.S. at 16-17, 30 S.Ct. at 686. [15] See, e.g., Sackler; Boyer v

Albritton v. General Portland Cement Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-03-31

Citation: 344 So. 2d 574, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3893

Snippet: Supp. 867 (D.Md. 1960). [6] Collier, note 3, at § 17.30. [7] The record before us does not indicate whether

Kizer v. Martin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-07-20

Citation: 132 So. 2d 14

Snippet: Warren v. Shaw, 43 Me. 429; In re McDevitt, 95 Cal. 17, 30 Pac. 101; 6 Pl. & Pr. 917." To the same effect

PC Lissenden Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-12-02

Citation: 116 So. 2d 632

Snippet: [8] Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1.17, 30 F.S.A. [9] Fla., 104 So.2d 375. [10] Ibid., 104

Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. Bedingfield

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-08-05

Citation: 60 So. 2d 489, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1394

Snippet: added as a party plaintiff under Common Law Rule 17, 30 F.S.A. In that motion, the petitioner here stated:

State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. County of Bay

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-11-13

Citation: 151 So. 10, 112 Fla. 687

Snippet: 30,000 6-1-33 17 30,000 12-1-33 18

Davis v. Ivey and Estes

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-03-05

Citation: 112 So. 264, 93 Fla. 387

Snippet: rainfall at Federal Point for one month in 1897, 17.30. There was a conflict in the evidence of plaintiffs

Haughey v. Heaney

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-02-14

Citation: 103 So. 400, 89 Fla. 102

Snippet: 500.00, for interest, $457.50, and for taxes, $17.30, making a total of $1,974.80; the three notes due