Florida Statute 17.30 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

17.30 Dissemination of information.—The Chief Financial Officer may disseminate, in any form or manner he or she considers appropriate, information regarding the Chief Financial Officer’s official duties.

History.—s. 8, ch. 83-132; s. 66, ch. 95-147; s. 42, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.30 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.30 on CourtListener

Amendments to 17.30

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.30

Total Results: 6 | Sort by: Relevance | Newest First

Copy

Jackson v. State, 18 So. 3d 1016 (Fla. 2009).

Cited 41 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 547, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1578, 2009 WL 3029668

See ch. 934, Fla. Stat. (2005); S.C.Code Ann. § 17-30-10 (Supp.2007). In State v. Smith, 641 So.2d 849

Copy

Gold Coast Publications, Inc. v. Corrigan, 798 F. Supp. 1558 (S.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11268, 1992 WL 174507

INCONSISTENT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17-30(66)(c)(1)(f) of the "Code of the City of Coral

Copy

Albritton v. Gen. Portland Cement Co., 344 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 1977).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3893

...[4] Jaubert Bros. Inc. v. Landry, 15 So.2d 158 (La. App. 1943); Collier, note 3, at § 17.29. [5] See Straton v. New, 283 U.S. 318, 51 S.Ct. 465, 75 L.Ed. 1060 (1931); Matter of Continental Midway Corp., 185 F. Supp. 867 (D.Md. 1960). [6] Collier, note 3, at § 17.30. [7] The record before us does not indicate whether Portland in fact has a lien on any property owned by Albritton. [8] See, for example, John Leslie Paper Co. v. Wheeler, 23 N.D. 477, 137 N.W. 412 (1912). See also, Collier, note 3, at § 17.30....

Copy

Jackson v. State, 127 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 2013).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2013 WL 5269865

Defender in Charleston, South Carolina; and (3) section 17-30-80 of the South Carolina Code titled “Interception

Copy

Waling Choizilme v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (11th Cir. 2018).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...2009) (concluding that “illicit trafficking,” as used in § 1182(a)(2)(C), is ambiguous and deferring to the BIA’s interpretation). Finally, the term “illicit trafficking” is used in some state statutes. But, again, it is left undefined. See, e.g., Alaska Stat. § 17.30.100; Colo....

Copy

Waling Choizilme v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 886 F.3d 1016 (11th Cir. 2018).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

undefined. See, e.g. , Alaska Stat. § 17.30.100 ; Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18-16-101