Cases from cite.case.law:

SCOTT, v. M. ESTALELLA,, 563 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . service "in any court of the United States.” .For the same reason the Hill court’s reliance on section 25.032 . . . Section 25.032 uses the words "courts ... of the United States” to specify the federal courts. . . .

W. HILL, v. WINN- DIXIE STORES, INC., 699 F. Supp. 876 (M.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . Section 25.032 uses the words “courts ... of the United States” to specify the federal courts. . . .

v. v. v., 414 U.S. 1062 (U.S. 1973)

. . . . §25.032 (1961), Fla. App. Rule 4.61 (1967).” Reported below: 478 F. 2d 817. . . .

ESSEX UNIVERSAL CORPORATION, v. J. YATES,, 305 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1962)

. . . (Cum.Supp. 1950) §§ 25.031 and 25.032. . See Mr. Justice Black dissenting in Mosser v. . . .

STANDARD ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, 249 F.2d 847 (7th Cir. 1957)

. . . . §§ 25.031-25.032 “authorizing the Supreme Court of Florida to answer questions certified by federal . . .