CopyCited 39 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 798, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8689, 1993 WL 101424
inequitable administration of the laws.... ” Restatement § 28(2). Neither exception applies here. First, although
0 red0 yellow28 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPalma (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWEBSTER (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHawthorne (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 21 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
portion of the ordinance reads this way: Section 28-2, Code of Ordinances, is amended as follows:
0 red0 yellow32 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGilliam (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 23 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 CCH OSHD 28, 082, 13 OSHC (BNA) 1489, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15247, 56 U.S.L.W. 2323
1160 (1978); Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28(2)(b). After the AU decisions in Williams’ favor
1 red0 yellow17 green0 procedural
CopyCited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
83, p. 673; Harper and James, the Law of Torts, § 28.2, p. 1536; Restatement, Torts, § 388, p. 1039. And
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySanders (1995)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 11 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5712
28-2-A-2, 28-2-A-3, 28-2-A-4, and 28-3-B-8. Section 28-2-A-1 limits ACLFs to buildings of no more than
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBeckman (1999)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityToback (1996)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 8 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2007 WL 143017
4701 ("Ordinance")[2] and Section 28-2 of the Code of Ordinances ("Section 28-2"). Plaintiffs brought this
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityFerguson (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12983, 2007 WL 628131
Ordinance 4649, as amended by Ordinance 4701, and Section 28-2. Primarily, Plaintiffs allege that the City's
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1985 WL 1083647
stated intent of chapter 28, as set forth in section 28-2(b): The efficient adequate and economic supply
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPichowski (2003)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 951, 2008 WL 239176
Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 28.2, at 685 (footnote omitted); Pino v. Dist. Ct. of
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16623, 2000 WL 1853526
3 Searches & Seizures, Arrests and Confessions § 28.2(a)(l)(2000), thus validating the second confession
0 red0 yellow1 green1 procedural
AffirmedAlvarez (2005)phrase: "affirmed in"
Review deniedAlvarez (2005)phrase: "review denied"
CopyPublished | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65966
language of the proceeding shall be English. D.E. 1-3 § 28.2; D.E. 1-4 § 32.2. On January 18, 2017, Defendants
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
Restatement, Torts § 388; 2 Harper and James, Torts § 28.2(1956). The trial judge admitted testimony of a