Florida Statute 28.3 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 28
CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 28.03

28.03 Obligation of sureties.—Each surety upon such bond may bind himself or herself for a specified sum, but the aggregate amount for which the sureties shall bind themselves shall not be less than the penalty of the bond.

History.—s. 9, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 934; GS 1822; RGS 3067; CGL 4848; s. 2, ch. 17754, 1937; s. 1, ch. 20719, 1941; s. 154, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 28.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 28.03 on CourtListener

Amendments to 28.03

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 28.03

Total Results: 16

Dorsey v. State

868 So. 2d 1192, 2003 WL 22964719

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2003 | Docket: 451945

Cited 41 times | Published

Jury Selection Strategy, 2 New York Pract. Series § 28.3 (2002).

Ralph Harrison Benning v. William F. Amideo

391 F.3d 1299, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24842

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 2, 2004 | Docket: 533261

Cited 36 times | Published

legal drinking age. See, e.g., Ala.Code § 28-3-15; Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 4-244; Colo.Rev.Stat

Cook v. State

921 So. 2d 631, 2005 WL 2242710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2005 | Docket: 1662918

Cited 23 times | Published

acknowledgement in Restatement (Second) of Judgments Section 28(3) of an exception to the general rule of issue

In re: Marckson Saint Fleur

824 F.3d 1337, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10395, 2016 WL 3190539

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 8, 2016 | Docket: 3071157

Cited 17 times | Published

2 Federal Habe-as Corpus Practice & Procedure § 28.3[d], at 1717 (7th ed. 2015) (explaining that "lack

Department of Transp. v. Burnette

384 So. 2d 916, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1980 | Docket: 1268996

Cited 17 times | Published

1324 (Okl. 1976); See, 6A Nichols, Eminent Domain, § 28.3 at 28, 89, 90 (3d Ed. 1979); 27 Am.Jur.2d, Eminent

Price v. Time, Inc.

416 F.3d 1327, 67 Fed. R. Serv. 906, 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2005, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14331, 2005 WL 1653730

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 15, 2005 | Docket: 65656985

Cited 11 times | Published

or purpose, does not commit a crime ....”); id. § 28-3-16 (“There shall be no advertising of alcoholic

Burstyn v. City of Miami Beach

663 F. Supp. 528, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5712

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1987 | Docket: 46385

Cited 11 times | Published

number of ACLF residents in Miami Beach; and Section 28-3-B-8 provides that there should be a minimum

Perez v. Perez

164 So. 2d 561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1964 | Docket: 1395668

Cited 9 times | Published

S. Domicile § 11 b; Goodrich, Conflict of Laws § 28 (3 ed.); Leflar, Conflict of Laws § 10 p. 18 (1959);

William P. Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation

177 So. 3d 489, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 596, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2417, 2015 WL 6513924

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008261

Cited 7 times | Published

portrayal and marketing.” Am. L. Prod. Liab. 3d § 28:3. In this regard, we conclude — as did the Supreme

Randall E. Lanier v. City of Newton, Alabama, Etc., Chief of Police in His Official Capacity of the City of Newton, Etc.

842 F.2d 253, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4486, 1988 WL 24184

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 11, 1988 | Docket: 980660

Cited 6 times | Published

revocation of license. Statutory Authority: Section 28-3-49, Code of Alabama, 1975. Adopted:

D.H. Ex Rel. J.R. v. Department of Children & Families

12 So. 3d 266, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5803, 2009 WL 1383344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2009 | Docket: 1646752

Cited 1 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 28.3 at 690 n. 11 ("Prohibition is an appropriate remedy

Michael B. Price v. Time, Inc.

425 F.3d 1292

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 15, 2005 | Docket: 398369

Cited 1 times | Published

purpose, does not commit a crime . . . ."); id. § 28-3-16 ("There shall be no advertising of alcoholic

Department of Health, Board of Dentistry v. Barr

882 So. 2d 501, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13854, 2004 WL 2098751

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2004 | Docket: 64832571

Cited 1 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 28.3 (2004 ed.)(“A circuit judge cannot properly issue

Willie James Pye v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic Prison

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 4, 2022 | Docket: 65398568

Published

update); Brian R. Means, Postconviction Remedies § 28.3 (June 2021 update); Justin F. Marceau, Deference

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. RIVERO DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, INC., A/A/O CARLOS BACALLAO

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2021 | Docket: 60290972

Published

California Uniform Commercial Code (2021) (same); § 28-3-310(2), Idaho Code (2021) (same).

BDO Seidman, LLP v. British Car Auctions, Inc.

745 So. 2d 1082, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15644, 1999 WL 1062462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1999 | Docket: 64792691

Published

of limitation for accounting malpractice suits. § 28-3-104(a)(2), Tennessee Code Annotated. Second, a