Florida Statute 44.107 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 44
MEDIATION ALTERNATIVES TO JUDICIAL ACTION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 44.107

44.107 Immunity for arbitrators, mediators, and mediator trainees.—

(1) Arbitrators serving under s. 44.103 or s. 44.104, mediators serving under s. 44.102, and trainees fulfilling the mentorship requirements for certification by the Supreme Court as a mediator shall have judicial immunity in the same manner and to the same extent as a judge.

(2) A person serving as a mediator in any noncourt-ordered mediation shall have immunity from liability arising from the performance of that person’s duties while acting within the scope of the mediation function if such mediation is:

(a) Required by statute or agency rule or order;

(b) Conducted under ss. 44.401-44.406 by express agreement of the mediation parties; or

(c) Facilitated by a mediator certified by the Supreme Court, unless the mediation parties expressly agree not to be bound by ss. 44.401-44.406.

The mediator does not have immunity if he or she acts in bad faith, with malicious purpose, or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.

(3) A person serving under s. 44.106 to assist the Supreme Court in performing its disciplinary function shall have absolute immunity from liability arising from the performance of that person’s duties while acting within the scope of that person’s appointed function.

History.—s. 5, ch. 89-31; s. 7, ch. 90-188; s. 1, ch. 95-421; s. 2, ch. 2004-291.

Note.—Former s. 44.307.

F.S. 44.107 on Google Scholar

F.S. 44.107 on Casetext

Amendments to 44.107

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 44.107

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 44.107.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 44.107

Total Results: 13

& SC15-2005 Nelson Serrano v. State of Florida and Nelson Serrano v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 225 So. 3d 737

Snippet: Court’s decision in Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987). However, Rock

Gibson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-08-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 199 So. 3d 1063, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12452, 2016 WL 4380326

Snippet: 16, Fla. Const. In Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987), the United States

Brown v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-02-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 27 So. 3d 181, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 981, 2010 WL 391818

Snippet: implicated. . In Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987), the Court explained

United Faculty of Florida v. PERC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-02-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 898 So. 2d 96

Snippet: dissatisfaction may lead to labor unrest. Id. at 43-44, 107 S.Ct. 2225. If the bargaining unit remains appropriate

State v. Famiglietti

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-05-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 817 So. 2d 901

Snippet: and must be held confidential. 480 U.S. at 43-44, 107 S.Ct. 989. The state statute contained numerous… pursuant to a court order.'" Id. at 44, 107 S.Ct. 989 (citation omitted). The Supreme Court

Vitakis-Valchine v. Valchine

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-08-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 793 So. 2d 1094

Snippet: manner and to the same extent as a judge." § 44.107, Fla. Stat. The mediation must be conducted in

State v. Pinder

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-07-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 678 So. 2d 410

Snippet: jurisdiction pursuant to a court order." Id. at 43-44, 107 S.Ct. at 994. After a limited in camera hearing

Roberts v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1990-09-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 568 So. 2d 1255

Snippet: on appeal. Likewise, Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987), which Roberts

Bailey v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-01-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 559 So. 2d 604

Snippet: in his own behalf. Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987). One year after

Stokes v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-07-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 548 So. 2d 188

Snippet: States Supreme Court in Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987). In Rock, the

Morgan v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-01-04T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 537 So. 2d 973

Snippet: Supreme Court decision in Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987), mandates this…First, the Court in Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987), was very careful

Andrews v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-10-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 533 So. 2d 841

Snippet: So.2d at 18. But see Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987) (per se exclusion

California Club Realty, Inc. v. Country Club Realty of South Florida, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-08-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 493 So. 2d 37, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1767, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9328

Snippet: (Fla.1969); Addison v. Hook, 91 Fla. 337, 343-44, 107 So. 623, 625 (1926); American Bank v. First American