Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-16T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: resolution.” Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Guyton, 388 So. 3d 50, 51-52 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (quoting Miami-Dade Cty.
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-30T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So. 3d 48, 50–51 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (reversing judgment for mortgagor
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-19T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41, 50–51 & n.9 (1938) (noting “the long-settled rule
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-07-11T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: disclosures, and based on his answer to questions 50, 51, and 53 in his 2019 JNC application.
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-04-03T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: be caused by “force, actual or implied.” Id. at 50–51; see also OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES, THE COMMON LAW
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-04-01T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: Conservation & Recreation Lands, 123 So. 3d 47, 50-51 (Fla. 2013). 3 This ensures that the initiative
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-04-01T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: -6- So. 3d 47, 50-51 (Fla. 2013)). It “is a rule of restraint designed…” Water & Land Conservation, 123 So. 3d at 50-51 (alteration in original) (quoting Advisory Op. to
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-13T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So. 3d 48, 50-51 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (“For better or for worse, it
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-12-13T00:00:00-08:00
Snippet: force as precedent”); Golden v. State, 528 So. 2d 50, 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (holding that an appellate
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-12-01T00:00:00-08:00
Snippet: U.S. 285, 301 (2017) (citing Gingles, 478 U.S. at 50–51). 16 The key Gingles precondition, which was not
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2022-08-25T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: proportionality analysis. Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37, 50-51 (1984) (“There is . . . no basis [in Supreme Court
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-04-13T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)); Schot, 273 So. 3d at 50-51 (reversing modifications, deletions, and additions
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-03-30T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: death. See, e.g., Powell v. Gessner, 231 So. 2d 50, 51 (Fla. 4th DCA) (“[T]he status of a child in respect
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-03-08T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: 2d DCA 2020))); Schot v. Schot, 273 So. 3d 48, 50-51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (reversing modifications, deletions
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2020-10-29T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: Eighth Amendment. Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37, 50-51 (1984) (“There is . . . no basis [in Supreme Court…by the Eighth Amendment, see Pulley 465 U.S. at 50-51. We cannot judicially rewrite our state statutes
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2020-01-15T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: quoting Water & Land Conservation, 123 So. 3d at 50-51). “A proposed amendment meets this test when it…quoting Water & Land Conservation, 123 So. 3d at 50-51). In fact, it does not appear that the proposed
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-09-18T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: In Egwuatu v. South Lubes, Inc., 976 So.2d 50, 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), the defendant, doing business
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-08T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: Pleasures II v. City of Sarasota, 77 FLA. B.J. 50, 51 (2003) (discussing four minimum requirements for
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-12-20T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 260 So. 3d 985
Snippet: attorneys say is not evidence." Order at 50-51 (citations omitted). King argues that Montfort
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-10-10T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: suggestive, see State v. Joseph, 79 So. 3d 49, 50-51 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). The record does not establish