Florida Statute 63.043 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 63
ADOPTION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 63.043

63.043 Mandatory screening or testing for sickle-cell trait prohibited.—No person, firm, corporation, unincorporated association, state agency, unit of local government, or any public or private entity shall require screening or testing for the sickle-cell trait as a condition for becoming eligible for adoption if otherwise eligible for adoption under the laws of this state.

History.—s. 4, ch. 78-35; s. 8, ch. 2003-58.

F.S. 63.043 on Google Scholar

F.S. 63.043 on Casetext

Amendments to 63.043

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 63.043

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 63.043.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 63.043

Total Results: 5

State v. Vargas

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-12-14

Citation: 667 So. 2d 175, 1995 WL 735925

Snippet: States, 420 U.S. 377, 388, 95 S.Ct. 1055, 1062-63, 43 L.Ed.2d 265 (1975). We have held that jeopardy

Keller v. Florida Power & Light Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-10-08

Citation: 156 So. 2d 775

Snippet: LIGHT COMPANY, and Harold Miller, Appellees. No. 63-43. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District

Volkman v. City of Daytona Beach

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-07-10

Citation: 155 So. 2d 132, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 2795

Snippet: Daytona Beach adopted. Resolution 63^-2, Resolution 63-43, Resolution 63-44 and Resolution 63-45, the purpose

Riens v. Riens

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1946-02-26

Citation: 25 So. 2d 79, 157 Fla. 118, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 675

Snippet: the cause." This section was reenacted as Section 63.43 Fla. Stats. 1941 (same F.S.A.). There is no contention

City of Jacksonville v. Bell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-04-19

Citation: 112 So. 885, 93 Fla. 936

Snippet: v. Baltimore, Ld. Baltimore etc. R. Co., 59 Md. 63; 43 Am. Rep. 540; Seibert v. Mo. Pac. R. Co. 188 Mo