Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 65.051 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 65.051 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 65.051

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 65
QUIETING TITLE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 65.051
65.051 Real estate; removing clouds; joinder.Two or more persons who are interested in removing a cloud from or quieting title to land as against the same clouds or adverse claims may join as plaintiffs in a single action to remove such clouds or quiet the title, although their interests relate to separate lands or parts thereof.
History.s. 1, ch. 10222, 1925; CGL 5008; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 20, ch. 67-254.
Note.Former s. 66.14.

F.S. 65.051 on Google Scholar

F.S. 65.051 on Casetext

Amendments to 65.051


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 65.051
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 65.051.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 65.051

Total Results: 2

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-04-15

Snippet: 073-112, and s. 959.225, F.S., and compare AGO 065-51. Given the foregoing statutory provisions, which

Accursio v. Harris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-04-27

Citation: 174 So. 2d 613, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4113

Snippet: PER CURIAM. By this appeal, the appellants seek review of a peremptory writ of mandamus directing them, as City Commissioners of the City of Florida City, Florida, to call a recall election pursuant to the provisions of the City Charter. It appears from the record that upon the return date, as set in the alternative writ, the respondents filed a return and a motion to quash and/or dismiss the alternative writ. Following a hearing thereon, the trial court denied the motion to quash and/or dismiss