Florida Statute 68.105 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 68
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 68.105

68.105 Use of funds; reports.—All appropriations made for the purposes of the Florida Access to Civil Legal Assistance Act shall be used only for legal education or assistance in family law, juvenile law, entitlement to federal benefits, protection from domestic violence, elder abuse, child abuse, or immigration law. These funds may not be used in criminal or postconviction relief matters; for lobbying activities; to sue the state, its agencies or political subdivisions, or colleges or universities; for class action lawsuits; to provide legal assistance with respect to noncriminal infractions pursuant to chapter 316, chapter 318, chapter 320, or chapter 322; to contest regulatory decisions of any municipal, county, or state administrative or legislative body; or to file or assist in the filing of private causes of action under federal or state statutes relating to or arising out of employment or terms or conditions of employment. The contracting organization shall require pilot projects to provide data on the number of clients served, the types of cases, the reasons the cases were closed, and the state dollars saved and federal dollars brought into the state because of the legal services provided. The contracting organization shall provide to the department, within 60 days after completing the contract, a report on the legal services provided, the state dollars saved, and the federal dollars brought into the state.

History.—s. 12, ch. 2002-288; s. 3, ch. 2012-96.

F.S. 68.105 on Google Scholar

F.S. 68.105 on Casetext

Amendments to 68.105

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 68.105

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 68.105.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 68.105

Total Results: 20

Jeremiah M. Rodgers v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 242 So. 3d 276

Snippet: Ake v. Oklahoma , 470 U.S. 68 , 105 S.Ct. 1087 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53

& SC16-1279 Robert Earl Peterson v. State of Florida and Robert Earl Peterson v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-07-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 221 So. 3d 571

Snippet: expert as required by Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (6) *580Florida

Ronnie Keith Williams v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-06-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 226 So. 3d 758, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 706, 2017 WL 2806711, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1432

Snippet: expert as required by Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (9) retrial counsel

& SC14-2106 Thomas Bevel v. State of Florida and Thomas Bevel v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-06-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 221 So. 3d 1168

Snippet: expert as required by Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (3) Bevel is

U'Dreka Andrews v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-05-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 218 So. 3d 466, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6131

Snippet: not the holdings, of Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), and State v.

Juan David Rodriguez v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-04-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 219 So. 3d 751, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 483, 2017 WL 1409668, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 891

Snippet: concerning Tata, an Ake[ v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985)] violation based

& SC14-881 Charles L. Anderson v. State of Florida and Charles L. Anderson v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-03-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 220 So. 3d 1133

Snippet: ; (7) a violation of Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (8) the death

Dale Glenn Middleton v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-03-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 220 So. 3d 1152, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 624, 2017 WL 930925, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1210

Snippet: Middleton’s reliance on Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), is misplaced.

Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-12-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 210 So. 3d 1

Snippet: evaluation as required by Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (13) Asay’s counsel

& SC14-567 Ronald Knight v. State of Florida & Ronald Knight v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-12-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 211 So. 3d 1

Snippet: health evaluation under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (8) Knight is

Frank A. Walls v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-10-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 213 So. 3d 340, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 466, 2016 WL 6137287, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2328

Snippet: evaluation in violation of Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (5) his death

& SC14-887 Neil K. Salazar v. State of Florida and Neil K. Salazar v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-02-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 188 So. 3d 799

Snippet: Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), and trial counsel

& SC13-1959 Lucious Boyd v. State of Florida & Lucious Boyd v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-12-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 200 So. 3d 685

Snippet: denial of rights under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (7) denial of

& SC13-1065 Harold Blake v. State of Florida and Harold Blake v. Timothy H. Cannon, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-12-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 180 So. 3d 89

Snippet: Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (7) the State

Norman Blake McKenzie v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-04-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 153 So. 3d 867

Snippet: pursuant to Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), and counsel were

Diaz v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-11-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 132 So. 3d 93, 2013 WL 6170645

Snippet: psychiatric assistance under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (10) trial counsel

Shellito v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-07-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 121 So. 3d 445, 2013 WL 3334922

Snippet: health assistance under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (5) whether trial

Farr v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-11-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 124 So. 3d 766, 2012 WL 9337465

Snippet: claim on appeal. In Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), the United States

Watts v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-03-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 82 So. 3d 1215, 2012 WL 974956, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4591

Snippet: 's rights under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), were violated

Buzia v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2011-12-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 82 So. 3d 784, 2011 WL 6090069

Snippet: health evaluation under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985). Buzia correctly