The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . sentence goes on to explain: As of the RJ Petition Date, LuxCo owned 74.14% of the total capital stock and 75.10% . . .
. . . $100.00 5.2 $520.00 Jeffrey Lais Paralegal $100.00 137.60 $13,760.00 Elizabeth Keenley Paralegal $100.00 75.10 . . .
. . . NG_50.70 30 80.70 Midwest; Dry Mill; Dry DGS, NG_68.40 30 98.40 Midwest; Wet Mill, 60% NG, 40% coal 75.10 . . .
. . . . § 75.10(d), include periods of calibration, quality assurance, preventative maintenance, repair, backups . . . This is consistent with 40 C.F.R. § 75.10(d). . . . The Court will not interpret the permit in a manner that would be inconsistent with 40 C.F.R. § 75.10 . . .
. . . 26.00% 54.00% 7-13 74.00% 45.90% 2002 2-6 23.60% 48.60% 7-13 76.50% 51.50% 2003 2-6 25.00% 41.30% 7-13 75.10% . . .
. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 75.10, p. 64 (1991) (“It has been held that the court should focus . . .
. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 75.10, p. 64 (1991) (“It has been held that the court should focus . . .
. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 75.10, p. 64 (1991) (“It has been held that the court should focus . . .
. . . judgment against such defendant, require proof of service of the summons in the manner required by G.S. 1-75.10 . . .
. . . . § 1-75.10(4). Id. . . . Gen.Stat. § 1-75.10(4) (2003). . . . . § 1-75.10(4) raises a rebuttable presumption of valid service consistent with North Carolina Rule of . . .
. . . 4,781.65 PHONE — W/E 3/12/98 Rsrve Charge 03/31 - 12.75 4,768.90 PHONE W/E 3/27/98 Rsrve Chai’ge 04/03 - 75.10 . . .
. . . Plaintiffs counsel filed an affidavit of service pursuant to North Carolina General Statute Section 1-75.10 . . .
. . . But see, 3 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, Section 75.10. . . .
. . . of the allowed amount of the objecting claimholder’s claim. 3 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, § 75.10 . . .
. . . return receipt, plaintiff has complied with N.C.R.Civ.P. 4(j)(1)(c) and 4(j2)(2) and N.C.Gen.Stat. 1-75.10 . . .
. . . Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 75.10 (1983). . . .
. . . 1,340,437.50 331,346.75 -1,009,090.75 225.00 55.62 MUSSLEWHITE 304.657.50 152,535.04 -152,122.46 100.00 75.10 . . .
. . . Holmes 75.10 Drs. Haber and Davis 339.20 Dr. Moore 102.53 Dr. Eisenband 75.10 Dr. . . .
. . . Laws, c. 40, §§ 75.00, 75.10 (McKinney 1967). . . . Penal Law § 75.10 (McKinney 1967). . . . Penal Law §§ 75.00, 75.10, was unconstitutional. . . . As the Practice Commentary to Section 75.10 — written by the present Commissioner of Corrections, Peter . . . proceedings brought by these three presented an identical challenge to the constitutionality of §§ 75.00 and 75.10 . . .
. . . .-00 and 75.10 of the New York Penal Law, they have been sentenced to indefinite reformatory terms of . . . York courts have held, as to §§ 2185 and 2195 of the old Penal Law, the predecessors of §§ 75.00 and 75.10 . . . example, plaintiffs allege that “There are numerous young people, who were sentenced under Penal Law § 75.10 . . .
. . . The class has been defined as follows: “The class challenging Sections 75.00 and 75.10, subd. 1 of the . . .
. . . to convene a three-judge court to consider the constitutionality on their face of Sections 75.00 and 75.10 . . . order are modified to provide that plaintiffs’ challenge to New York Penal Law, Sections 75.00 and 75.10 . . .
. . . or less, plaintiffs are serving reformatory terms of up to four years pursuant to Sections 75.00 and 75.10 . . . I New York Penal Law §§ 75.00 and 75.10, subd. 1. . . . Section 75.10, subd. 1 provides that a reformatory sentence terminates upon discharge of the inmate by . . . The practice commentary to Section 75.10, subd. 1 states that “the purpose of a reformatory sentence . . . the interests of male inmates or inmates at other institutions who are sentenced under §§ 75.-00 and 75.10 . . .
. . . counts: the first asserts that he knowingly concealed and facilitated the concealment of approximately 75.10 . . .
. . . question with which we are concerned is discussed in Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation, sec. 75.10 . . .
. . . the vessel delivered on board and available for passengers’ use (paragraph 3 of the stipulation) __ 75.10 . . .
. . . amount of $1,349.42 payable in seventeen monthly installments of $74.96 ‘and one monthly installment of $75.10 . . .
. . . It was further determined that series A bonds at 75.10 are equivalent to series B bonds at 46.88; and . . .