Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 75.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 75.11 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 75.11

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 75
BOND VALIDATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 75.11
75.11 Stamping instruments validated.
(1) Bonds or certificates, when validated under this chapter, shall have stamped or written thereon, by the proper officers of such county, municipality or district issuing them, a statement in substantially the following form:

“This bond is one of a series of bonds which were validated by judgment of the Circuit Court for   County, rendered on  ,   (year)  .”

(2) A certified copy of the judgment or decree shall be received as evidence in any court in this state.
History.s. 5, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3300; s. 5, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5110, 5127; s. 1, ch. 57-300; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 4, ch. 99-6.

F.S. 75.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 75.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 75.11


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 75.11
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 75.11.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 75.11

Total Results: 16

South Marion Real Estate Holdings, LLC d/b/a Oxford Downs, and Darold R. Donnelly v. Florida Gaming Control Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-17T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Florida Administrative Code. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 75.11.005(5) (2023). 2 Based on record evidence, Appellants

Andrew Michael Gosciminski v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-12-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 262 So. 3d 47

Snippet: section of statue head (Exhibit 74) 15. IRCL-75, eleven manila packets with sections of statue (Exhibit

TEODORO LOPEZ v. MARIANA GARCIA HERNANDEZ

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-07-25T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: value or appreciation of nonmarital property.” § 61.075(11), Fla. Stat. Under section 61.075(1), “the court

Gardiner v. Gardiner

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-12-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 207 So. 3d 987, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19126

Snippet: However, special equity was abolished in 2008. § 61.075(11), Fla. Stat. (2008) ("Special equity is abolished

Gonzalez v. Onewest Bank, FSB

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-11-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 204 So. 3d 167, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17578

Snippet: change date is that it was somewhere between 2.75% and 11.875%. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and

Ter Keurst v. Ter Keurst

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-10-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 202 So. 3d 123, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15237

Snippet: 46, § 1, Laws of Fla.; see also § 61.075(11), Fla. Stat. (2013) (setting forth the same language

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2011-12-04T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: 9 Section 394.75(7), Fla. Stat. 10 Section 394.75(11), Fla. Stat. 11 Id. 12 Rule 65E-14.005(1)(b), Fla

Jurasek v. Jurasek

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-08-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 67 So. 3d 1210, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13759, 2011 WL 3820754

Snippet: distribution" of marital property. See § 61.075(11) Fla. Stat. (2008). The husband argued that the

Davis v. Davis

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-04-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 32 So. 3d 743, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 2010 WL 1542649

Snippet: § 1, at 738, Laws of Fla. (now codified as § 61.075(11), Fla. Stat. (2009)), it placed the burden on the

ANIMAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION OF FL., INC. v. Siegel

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-02-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 867 So. 2d 451

Snippet: #x27;s use of Tiger's Eye Production. (T. 75). 11. From or about May 23, 2002 the FOUNDATION has

Riley v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1987-07-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 511 So. 2d 282

Snippet: .F.R. § 91.79(d) (1986). 230 Cal. Rptr. at 174-75. [11] To require persons to erect such barriers is

Mendiola v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-12-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 490 So. 2d 75, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 125, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6020

Snippet: Hendry, Hubbart, Jor 31 December 1985 490 So. 2d 75, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 125, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6020

Perez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-05-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 313 So. 2d 146, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 16287

Snippet: Appeal dismissed. No. 75-11 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp Fla. Dist

Pacific Plantation Partners, Ltd. v. General Electric Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-03-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 309 So. 2d 559, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14405

Snippet: CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur. No. 75-11 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Stone v. Stone

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-03-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 311 So. 2d 428, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 16244

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed. No. 75-11 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

White v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1927-04-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 113 So. 94, 93 Fla. 905

Snippet: Hesterberg, 211 U.S. 31, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 10, 53 L.Ed. 75; 11 R. C. L. 1045. Mr. Justice Day, in the above case