The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 75
BOND VALIDATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 75.11

75.11 Stamping instruments validated.—

(1) Bonds or certificates, when validated under this chapter, shall have stamped or written thereon, by the proper officers of such county, municipality or district issuing them, a statement in substantially the following form:

“This bond is one of a series of bonds which were validated by judgment of the Circuit Court for County, rendered on , (year) .”

(2) A certified copy of the judgment or decree shall be received as evidence in any court in this state.

History.—s. 5, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3300; s. 5, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5110, 5127; s. 1, ch. 57-300; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 4, ch. 99-6.

F.S. 75.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 75.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 75.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 75.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 75.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In J. HENNEY, v., 451 B.R. 724 (W.D. Mich. 2011)

. . . Rather, the state trial court gave only the Model Civil Jury Instructions 75.01, 75.02 and 75.11, which . . .

THEME PROMOTIONS, INC. a d b a Co- Op v. NEWS AMERICA MARKETING FSI, INC. a, 731 F. Supp. 2d 937 (N.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . $54.01 $153.44 $25.42 $72.22 2002 0.351 $70.23 $200.09 $25.64 $73.05 2003 0.356 $70.45 $197.89 $26.74 $75.11 . . .

JASHINSKI v. LTC HOLCOMB, Ft. CPT O Ft., 482 F. Supp. 2d 785 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . . §§ 75.1-75.11, and a current version of Army Regulation 600-43, which provides uniform standards for . . .

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC., 397 F. Supp. 2d 943 (N.D. Ill. 2005)

. . . assets, exclusive of government securities and cash items on a consolidated basis, are as follows: 75.11% . . .

JEFFERSON- PILOT INSURANCE COMPANY, v. SHORT M., 346 F. Supp. 2d 825 (M.D.N.C. 2004)

. . . North Carolina General Statute 1-75.11 reads as follows: Where a defendant fails to appear in the action . . .

P. McCULLOUGH, III, v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, D., 137 F. Supp. 2d 557 (D.N.J. 2001)

. . . Test, at 75.11. . . .

ASHLAND OIL, INC. v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY,, 364 F. Supp. 6 (N.D. Okla. 1973)

. . . Tulsa, Oklahoma Expenses: (7-1-69 thru 12-31-72) Duplicating $ 3.90 Long Distance 56.81 Travel 14.40 $ 75.11 . . .

INDIANA GENERAL CORP. v. KRYSTINEL CORP., 297 F. Supp. 427 (S.D.N.Y. 1969)

. . . represented the Ferramic Q material as it was marketed and sold was-as follows: Ferric oxide (Fe203) 75.11% . . .

WRIGHT, v. WALLING,, 159 F. Supp. 190 (W.D. Ark. 1958)

. . . advised in the premises, finds the actions sufficient for granting a judgment to the plaintiffs for $75.11 . . . ; “It Is, Therefore, Accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that judgment in the amount of $75.11, . . . On November 13, 1957, Wright paid Imogene Walling the sum of $75.11, and the judgment of the Court of . . .