The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 76.02

76.02 Attachment of corporate stock.—Shares of stock in any corporation incorporated by the laws of this state are subject to attachment under the circumstances hereinafter provided and in the manner prescribed for levy of execution thereon.

History.—s. 1, ch. 3917, 1889; RGS 2846; CGL 4533; s. 26, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 76.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE G., 360 F. Supp. 3d 861 (W.D. Wis. 2019)

. . . privileges used in and necessary to the prosecution of the business of any company enumerated in s. 76.02 . . .

BASF AG, v. GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY,, 595 F. Supp. 2d 899 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . subpoenas of witnesses, which exceeded the maximum allowable $40 service fee per subpoena; and (6) $76.02 . . .

In GARSTECKI,, 364 B.R. 95 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2006)

. . . , 1987, a mortgage foreclosure judgment in the amount of $188,728.75, plus interest at the rate of $76.02 . . .

SHIRT v. HAZELTINE,, 336 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D.S.D. 2004)

. . . population) 73.06 74.21 74.25 District 27 Senate (VAP) 67.19 68.96 3.98 (total population) 74.05 75.Í 76.02 . . .

J. COONTS, M. v. POTTS, Sr., 316 F.3d 745 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . an application for a writ of execution, and the court clerk may issue the writ under Rules 76.01 and 76.02 . . .

A. GIBBONS, v. NER HOLDINGS, INC., 983 F. Supp. 310 (D. Conn. 1997)

. . . to a stock subscription agreement dated September 30, 1991, the plaintiff finally agreed to purchase 76.02 . . . As a result, the plaintiff had paid $16,453 more than the actual book value for his 76.02 shares. . . . of shares that would be offered to the plaintiff; however, the plaintiff ultimately only purchased 76.02 . . .

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 59 F.3d 55 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 76.02. .The following tax levies (in billions) from 1992 are typical (R. 17): all property: $4.9 . . .

In P. PACANA, P. PACANA, v. S. PACANA- SILER,, 125 B.R. 19 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 76.02 (W.L. Norton, Jr. 1987). . . .

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD CO. Co. Co. Co. B. St. Co. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE OF WISCONSIN,, 570 F. Supp. 585 (W.D. Wis. 1983)

. . . . § 76.02(2) and a “rail carrier” providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Interstate . . . Green Bay .is a “railroad company” within the meaning of Wis.Stat. § 76.02(2) and a “rail carrier” providing . . . Soo Line is a “railroad company” within the meaning of Wis.Stat. § 76.02(2) and a “rail carrier” providing . . . in Chicago, Illinois., Chicago, Milwaukee is a “railroad company” within the meaning of Wis.Stat. § 76.02 . . . Wis.Stat. §§ 76.01, 76.02(10). . . .

A. M. SEAMON v. UPHAM,, 536 F. Supp. 931 (E.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . .-01, 76.02, 76.03, 76.04, 77, 78.01, 78.04, 78.05, 78.06, 78.07, 78.08, 78.09, 79.02, 79.03, 79.04, . . .

CONSOLIDATED FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ANCHOR SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, 480 F. Supp. 640 (D. Kan. 1979)

. . . where, as here, absolutely no anticompetitive intent or motive existed. 16J Von Kalinowski, supra, at § 76.02 . . . See also 16J Von Kalinowski at § 76.02[1], p. 76-15: The per se boycott rule is applicable only when . . .

SMITH v. PRO FOOTBALL, INC. a a k a, 593 F.2d 1173 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

. . . See, e. g., 11 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 76.02 at 76-11 (1978) (citing cases . . .

D. BARTHOLOMEW v. VIRGINIA CHIROPRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC., 451 F. Supp. 624 (W.D. Va. 1978)

. . . Von Kalinowsky, Antitrust Law and Trade Regulation, § 76.02 (1977 ed.); P. . . .

ACKERMAN- CHILLINGWORTH, DIVISION OF MARSH McLENNAN, INCORPORATED, a a a a a S. a T. T. v. PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, a No. a a T., 579 F.2d 484 (9th Cir. 1978)

. . . Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation 76.02, at 76-11 to 76-12 (1977); Barber, Refusals . . .

PITTS, v. CATES v. D. BUSBEE,, 536 F.2d 56 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . of the following Census Tracts of such county: Tracts 66.01, 66.02, 68, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76.01, 76.02 . . .

J. CRAVEN, v. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, INC. R., 40 F.R.D. 8 (D.S.C. 1966)

. . . . § 76.02 Maximum Limit of Damages. . . .

S. BOWDEN, T. J. Co. J. M. H. H. Jr. J. Co. v. UNITED STATES J. MALLOY, UNITED STATES J. MALLOY, v. S. BOWDEN,, 239 F.2d 572 (9th Cir. 1956)

. . . P............... 76.02 Galland Oilfield Service .... 125.00 Gridley Construction Co. .. 906.49 Holland . . .