Florida Statute 77.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 77
GARNISHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 77.15

77.15 Proceedings against third persons named in answer.—If the answer of garnishee shows that there is any of defendant’s personal property in the possession or control of any person who has not been garnisheed, on motion of plaintiff a writ of garnishment shall issue against the person having personal property of the defendant and the person shall answer and be liable as other garnishees.

History.—s. 3, ch. 43, 1845; RS 1677; GS 2141; RGS 3443; CGL 5296; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 27, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 77.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 77.15 on Casetext

Amendments to 77.15

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 77.15

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 77.15.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 77.15

Total Results: 20

Peetluk v. Huffstetler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-04-04

Citation: 840 So. 2d 1175, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4498, 2003 WL 1785812

Snippet: 280) $636,470 $ 14,903 ($27,310) Other Income 43 8,077 15,623 $32,1732 Federal Tax Paid O $235,740 $ 4,765

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2003-01-06

Snippet: 01(3)(b), Fla. Stat. 3 See, Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 77-15 (1977) and 77-16 (1977). Compare, Op. Att'y Gen

Chiles v. State Employees Attorneys Guild

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-05-20

Citation: 734 So. 2d 1030, 1999 WL 330081

Snippet: See Fla. Bar Bd. of Govs. Advisory Ethics Op. 77-15 (May 13, 1978). Although the Board concluded that

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1986-02-06

Snippet: exercisable by each such agency; AGO's 84-40, 77-16, 77-15. Cf., AGO 74-220. Based on the clear language of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1984-08-24

Snippet: separately exercisable by each such agency. See, AGO's 77-15 and 77-16. Compare, AGO 74-220. Since subsections

Pinellas County v. Brown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-10-15

Citation: 420 So. 2d 308

Snippet: nonjury trial the court awarded appellees $116,077.15. The county's motion for rehearing was denied and

Broda v. City of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-03-28

Citation: 357 So. 2d 430, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22377

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of City of Miami v. State ex rel. Groner, 164 So.2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); City of Miami v. Shires, 167 So.2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Gallegos v. Bailey, 180 So.2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-02-21

Snippet: under the authority of certain federal acts. In AGO 077-15 I observed that metropolitan planning organizations

RBF Management Co. v. Sunshine Towers Apartment Residences Association, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-11-30

Citation: 352 So. 2d 561

Snippet: a Nonprofit Florida Corporation, Appellee. No. 77-15. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-02-09

Snippet: organizations, and I therefore direct your attention to AGO 077-15, wherein I concluded that a duly constituted metropolitan

Yoo Hoo of Florida Corp. v. Catroneo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-05-18

Citation: 175 So. 2d 220, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4178

Snippet: p. 757, and Haut v. Rossbach, 1940, 128 N.J.Eq. 77, 15 A.2d 227, affirmed 128 N.J.Eq. 478, 17 A.2d 165

Renpak, Inc. v. Oppenheimer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-08-01

Citation: 104 So. 2d 642

Snippet: 757, and Haut v. Rossbach, 1940, 128 N.J. Eq. 77, 15 A.2d 227, affirmed 128 N.J. Eq. 478, 17 A.2d 165

St. Petersburg Lumber Co. v. Risley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-04-12

Citation: 173 So. 832, 127 Fla. 658, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1508

Snippet: personal judgment. Nutt v. Coddington, 34 Fla. 77, 15 Sou. Rep. 667; Thrasher v. Doig, 18 Fla. 809; Agin

London Operating Co. v. Continental Construction Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-12-26

Citation: 159 So. 33, 118 Fla. 15, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1980

Snippet: 10 South. Rep. 818; Nutt v. Codington, 34 Fla. 77, 15 South. Rep. 667; Macfarlane v. Southern Lumber

Smith, Et Vir. v. Chapman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-09-21

Citation: 156 So. 544, 116 Fla. 576

Snippet: a personal judgment. Nutt v. Codington, 34 Fla. 77, 15 Sou. Rep. 667; Thrasher v. Doig, 18 Fla. 809; Agin

Tallahassee Variety Works v. Brown

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-01-08

Citation: 138 So. 759, 106 Fla. 599

Snippet: Rep. 818; Nutt v. Codington, *Page 612 34 Fla. 77, 15 So.2d Rep. 667; Macfarlane v. Southern Lumber Supply

M. J. Hoffman Construction Co. v. Ward

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-04-13

Citation: 121 So. 800, 97 Fla. 530

Snippet: under her contract. See Nutt v. Codington, 34 Fla. 77, 15 So. R. 667; Sec. 2, Art. XI, Const.; Micou et al

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Levy

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1914-11-10

Citation: 68 Fla. 234, 67 So. 47

Snippet: Bergerman v. Indianapolis & St. L. Ry. Co., 104 Mo. 77, 15 S. W. Rep. 992; Haney v. Caldwell, 43 Ark. 184;

Clarkson v. Louderback, Gilbert & Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-06-15

Citation: 36 Fla. 660

Snippet: 7 South. Rep. 162; Nutt vs. Codington, 34 Fla. 77, 15 South. Rep. 667. Under the allegations of the bill

Dollner, Potter & Co. v. Snow

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1877-01-15

Citation: 16 Fla. 86

Snippet: Maine, 572; 5 Wis., 245; 9 ib., 524; 9 Foster, 77; 15 N. Y., 575. What is here said as to' the purpose