Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 78.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 78.08 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 78.08

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 78
REPLEVIN
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 78.08
78.08 Writ; form.The writ shall command the sheriff to replevy the described personal property in possession of defendant.
History.s. 4, Mar. 11, 1845; RS 1714; GS 2178; RGS 3483; CGL 5336; s. 28, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 73-20; s. 6, ch. 83-255.

F.S. 78.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 78.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 78.08


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 78.08
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 78.08.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS COMPANY, v. SYNVINA C. V., 904 F.3d 996 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

. . . The highest yield of 78.08% was obtained with only HMF as a reactant, while the lowest was 46.85% using . . . observed that the '921 patent specification disclosed an experiment where HMF was oxidized to FDCA at 78.08% . . .

R. JOHNSON, v. AMERICAN FIRST FEDERAL, INC., 133 So. 3d 559 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Second, Aysisayh was decided under a former version of the replevin statute, section 78.08, which was . . .

IN RE NE OPCO, INC., 501 B.R. 233 (Bankr. D. Del. 2013)

. . . will grant Westfield an administrative expense claim, pursuant to section 503(b)(9), in the amount of $78.08 . . . results in an allowed administrative expense claim, pursuant to section 503(b)(9), in the amount of $78.08 . . . In that regard, the Court will grant Westfield an administrative priority claim in the amount of $78.08 . . .

COFIELD v. CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA W., 969 F. Supp. 749 (N.D. Ga. 1997)

. . . Aug. 1990 83.43 8.45 .963 18.36 Von Epps State Rep. 1992 78.08 20.85 .931 6.37 Jackson President 1988 . . .

In L. BORK, GARROW OIL CORP. v. L. BORK,, 147 B.R. 734 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1992)

. . . The statute further provides that “the wholesaler, as defined in s. 78.08, shall collect from the purchaser . . . Wis.Stat. §§ 78.08(1), 78.-12(3), (4); see also Edmiston, 36 B.R. 1. . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 320 31 100.00% 24 77.42% 7 22.58% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 73 100.00% 16 21.92% 57 78.08% . . .

A. M. SEAMON v. UPHAM,, 536 F. Supp. 931 (E.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . .-01, 76.02, 76.03, 76.04, 77, 78.01, 78.04, 78.05, 78.06, 78.07, 78.08, 78.09, 79.02, 79.03, 79.04, . . .

B. FEENEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, 451 F. Supp. 143 (D. Mass. 1978)

. . . a third position, Assistant Secretary, Board of Dental Examiners, the top three scores were 89.72, 78.08 . . . That the appointee for this position had a score of 78.08, the lowest of the three certified, indicates . . .

A. ANTHONY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS B. FEENEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, 415 F. Supp. 485 (D. Mass. 1976)

. . . She was not certified and a male veteran with an examination grade of 78.08 was appointed. . . .

TOROSIAN v. NATIONAL CAPITAL BANK OF WASHINGTON,, 411 F. Supp. 167 (D.D.C. 1976)

. . . obligating them to repay $2,194.08 in 23 equal monthly payments of $92.00, and a final payment of $78.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CODY,, 404 F. Supp. 1036 (E.D. Mo. 1975)

. . . effect at the time of this conviction a Missouri Supreme Court Rule 78.04, which is now Missouri Rule 78.08 . . .

R. SAUERHOFF v. HEARST CORPORATION, 388 F. Supp. 117 (D. Md. 1974)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice & Instructions § 78.08 at 201 (1970); Prosser, supra n. 12, § 112, at . . .

NORTHSIDE MOTORS OF FLORIDA, INC. a v. BRINKLEY,, 282 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 1973)

. . . See Florida Statutes, Sections 78.01, 78.07, 78.08, 78.10 and 78.13, F.S.A. . . .

FUENTES v. SHEVIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA,, 407 U.S. 67 (U.S. 1972)

. . . . § 78.08 (Supp. 1972-1973). . . . Ann. § 78.08 (Supp. 1972-1973) : “Writ;.' . . .

FUENTES, a v. FAIRCLOTH,, 317 F. Supp. 954 (S.D. Fla. 1970)

. . . before the Court and that the pre-judgment replevin procedure established by §§ 78.01, 78.04, 78.07, 78.08 . . . . §§ 78.01, 78.08, 78.10, 78.11 and 78.12, F.S.A. . . . commands the executing officer to replevy the goods and to summon the defendant to answer the complaint (78.08 . . .

I. PALMER, Jr. Co. B B v. C. STOKELY, K. a, 255 F. Supp. 674 (W.D. Okla. 1966)

. . . Blue Bonnet was charged for catalogs at a rate of $78.08 a thousand, whereas the cost was $77.00 a thousand . . .

MILLER, v. TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT CORP., 178 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . bond to have the property forthcoming if “defendant recover judgment against him in the action;” and § 78.08 . . .

L. B. v. S. v., 42 B.T.A. 566 (B.T.A. 1940)

. . . At the hearing it was stipulated that $78.08 of the amount of interest claimed as a deduction in 1935 . . . In the redeter-mination of the deficiency for 1936 under Rule 50 the $78.08 payment of interest will . . .

LOFQUIST REALTY CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 102 F.2d 945 (7th Cir. 1939)

. . . This 1930 return disclosed a tax liability of $78.08. . . .

In FELSON, 139 F. 275 (N.D.N.Y. 1905)

. . . Hitchcock, as attorney for a certain creditor, disbursements, $28.08; services, $50; total, $78.08. . . .