Florida Statute 106.055 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 106
CAMPAIGN FINANCING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 106.055

106.055 Valuation of in-kind contributions.—Any person who makes an in-kind contribution shall, at the time of making such contribution, place a value on such contribution, which valuation shall be the fair market value of such contribution. Travel conveyed upon private aircraft shall be valued at the actual cost of per person commercial air travel for the same or a substantially similar route.

History.—s. 44, ch. 77-175; s. 43, ch. 2007-30.

F.S. 106.055 on Google Scholar

F.S. 106.055 on Casetext

Amendments to 106.055

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 106.055

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 106.055.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 106.055

Total Results: 14

Lafferty v. Tennant

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-08-03T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 528 So. 2d 1307

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 So. 836 (1911). Accordingly, Mrs. Lafferty is entitled

In Re Ginsberg's Estate

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1951-01-29T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 50 So. 2d 539

Snippet: Motor's, Inc. valued at $42,236.24 and the $27,106.55 in cash less the sum of $4,593.07, which is the

McGowin v. McGowin

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-01-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 165 So. 274, 122 Fla. 394

Snippet: power. 19 C.J. 23; Martin v. Martin, 173 Ala. 106, 55 South. Rep. 632; Herron v. Passailaigue, 92 Fla

Bailey v. Crum

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1935-06-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 162 So. 356, 120 Fla. 36

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 So.2d 836; Director General of Railroads v. Into

County of Okeechobee v. Fla. Natl. Bank of Jax

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-05-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 150 So. 124, 112 Fla. 309

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 So. 826. And so it is, that had the suit here been

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Ebert

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1931-07-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 138 So. 4, 102 Fla. 641

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank,61 Fla. 106, 55 South. Rep. 836; Paul v. Commercial Bank of Ocala

O'Steen v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1926-12-13T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 111 So. 725, 92 Fla. 1062

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 So. 836, it was held: "Upon a writ of error

Payne v. Ivey

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1922-03-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 83 Fla. 436, 93 So. 143

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 South. Rep. 836), or where a general *442demurrer

Director General of Railroads v. Into

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1922-03-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 83 Fla. 377

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 South. Rep. 836; Painter Fertilizer Co. v. DuPont

Hancock v. State Exchange Bank

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1915-11-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 70 Fla. 243

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 South. Rep. 836. Reversed for proper judgment.

Thomas v. Nathan

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1913-04-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 65 Fla. 391

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 South. Rep. 836, it Avas held that the “judgment

Crystal River Lumber Co. v. Consolidated Naval Stores Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1912-01-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 63 Fla. 119

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 South. Rep. 836. At the trial before a referee,

Danson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1911-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 62 Fla. 29

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 South. Rep. 836. As was also said in McKay v. Lane

Bank of Jasper v. Tuten

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1911-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 62 Fla. 423

Snippet: Holmes Co. v. Indian River State Bank, 61 Fla. 106, 55 South. Rep. 836; Danson v. State, decided here