The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 107
CONVENTIONS TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 107.10

107.10 Certification of convention action.—When the convention shall have agreed, by “yea” and “nay” vote of a majority of the total number of delegates elected, to the ratification or rejection of the proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States, a certificate to that effect shall be executed by its president and secretary and filed with the Department of State of Florida. A copy of the minutes of its proceedings, likewise signed by such officials, shall also be filed with the Department of State. The Department of State of Florida, after the filing of such certificate, shall transmit a copy thereof, certified under the Great Seal of Florida, to the Secretary of State of the United States.

History.—s. 10, ch. 16180, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 319(10); ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 107.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 107.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 107.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 107.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 107.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SAMUELS, v. FISCHER, D. D. M. C. R. K. L. T. R. Jr. C. J. S., 168 F. Supp. 3d 625 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . direct order (Rule 106.10), movement regulation (Rule 109.12), and interference with employee (Rule 107.10 . . .

SLOANE, v. BORAWSKI,, 64 F. Supp. 3d 473 (W.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . violations: 100.11 attempted assault; 104.11 violent conduct; 104.13 disturbing the order of the facility, 107.10 . . . I have found you guilty of the charges, 104.11 violent conduct, 104.13 creating a disturbance, 107.10 . . . violations: 100.11 attempted assault; 104.11 violent conduct; 104.13 disturbing the order of the facility, 107.10 . . .

BREWER, v. C. O. F. KAMAS C. O. G., 533 F. Supp. 2d 318 (W.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Misbehavior Report”) charging Plaintiff with violating DOCS Rules 106.10 (Refusing a Direct Order), 107.10 . . .

J. MORIARTY, v. B. MUZYKA,, 379 F. Supp. 2d 935 (N.D. Ill. 2005)

. . . following (P.Ex. 12): Health and Welfare Fund Pension Fund Legal Fund Contributions $24,807.40 $ 9,054.55 $107.10 . . .

DAVIDSON, v. MURRAY, A. III,, 371 F. Supp. 2d 361 (W.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Sherlock found plaintiff guilty of violating inmate disciplinary rules 102.10, 107.10 and 107.11, and . . . Rule 107.10 provides: Inmates shall not physically or verbally obstruct or interfere with an employee . . .

C. J. SCOTT, v. T. A. COUGHLIN, Jr. J. M. R. W. F. J. J., 344 F.3d 282 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . attempted assault, 106.10 for violating a direct order, 104.11 for engaging in violent conduct, and 107.10 . . .

A. DIXON, v. S. GOORD,, 224 F. Supp. 2d 739 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Disciplinary Rule 100.11 (Assault on Staff), Rule 106.10 (Refusal to Obey a Direct Order), and Rule 107.10 . . .

ESPINAL, v. S. GOORD, Lt. Lt. A. B. D. C. R., 180 F. Supp. 2d 532 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Prison Rules 100.11 (assault on staff) and 107.10 (interference with employee). . . . .

ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a. k. a. R. E. Co. v. WHITAKER CONTRACTING CORP., 242 F.3d 1035 (11th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 107.10 The location ... and horizontal and vertical placement with respect to the pavement of warning . . .

W. POOLE, ELLIOTT, v. TEXTRON, INC., 192 F.R.D. 494 (D. Md. 2000)

. . . McKee’s hours of 107.10 totaled $24,097.50. Ms. Willis’ hours of 60.00 totaled $9,000.00. Mr. . . .

HARRIS, v. P. KEANE Lt. W. Lt. F. V. O C. O. H. C. O. A. C. O. C. O. C. C. O. G. C. O. K. C. O. L., 962 F. Supp. 397 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Plaintiff was charged with violating Prison Rules 104.13, Creating a Disturbance; 107.10, Interference . . .

BROWN, v. M. BUSCH G., 954 F. Supp. 588 (W.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . second incident, Busch charged plaintiff with violation of inmate disciplinary Rules 106.10, 102.10 and 107.10 . . . Rule 107.10 provides: Inmates shall not physically or verbally obstruct or interfere with an employee . . .

RODRIGUEZ v. R. J. PHILLIPS, NY N. Y. C., 66 F.3d 470 (2d Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 270.2(B)(8)107.10, and that if plaintiff violated this prohibition, no First Amendment claim would . . .

GREEN, v. BAUVI, A., 824 F. Supp. 1134 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . MR-1 charged Plaintiff with violating three prison disciplinary rules 107.10, 107.11, and 109.10. . . . The current versions of these disciplinary rules, implemented on September 1, 1988, provide: (1) Rule 107.10 . . .

GREEN, v. BAUVI, A., 792 F. Supp. 928 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . . & Regs. tit. 7 (“7 NYCRR”), § 270.1: Rule 107.10 (Inmates shall not physically or verbally obstruct . . .

YOUNG a k a v. M. MOLLOY,, 760 F. Supp. 43 (W.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . defendant issued the plaintiff a misbehavior report dated February 6, 1989 for violating correctional rule 107.10 . . .

BEAVER VALLEY POWER COMPANY, a Pa. v. NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING CO. v. MICHAEL BAKER, JR. INC. BEAVER VALLEY POWER COMPANY,, 883 F.2d 1210 (3d Cir. 1989)

. . . See §§ 107.10, 107.13. . . .

PUCKETT v. MOBILE CITY COMMISSION, 380 F. Supp. 593 (S.D. Ala. 1974)

. . . Duff 107.10 George H. Goodwin 110.22 Jesse E. Kersh, Jr. 40.53 James E. . . .

S S LOGGING CO. v. B. G. BARKER O. C. E. Wm. O. a Co. a a C. Wm. O., 366 F.2d 617 (9th Cir. 1966)

. . . When these bids were received S & S Logging bid for the cedar $107.10 per thousand (as compared with . . .

HESSMAN, A. In No. v. CAMPBELL,, 134 F. Supp. 416 (S.D. Ind. 1955)

. . . Stakley the sum of $141.24, representing’ wagering tax of $107.10, penalties for failure to file a timely . . .

MALLONEE v. FAHEY FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF PORTLAND, 117 F. Supp. 259 (S.D. Cal. 1953)

. . . . § 107.10 as the provision which would permit administrative hearing by the Home Loan Bank Board on . . . But an examination of § 107.10 reveals that it covers only the matter of hearings on regulations or proposed . . .

BUTTON v. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK, 48 F. Supp. 168 (W.D. Ky. 1943)

. . . delivered to the plaintiff its policy of insurance, whereby in consideration of an annual premium of $107.10 . . .

GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO. v. ARMOUR CO., 26 F. Supp. 964 (N.D. Ill. 1939)

. . . the Gomph and Henry tariffs: Spokane to Portland: 21,000 pounds at fresh meat rate of 51 cents____$107.10 . . . bouse products, 26,390 lbs. at 36%0 96.32 $120.17 120.17 Minimum charge per car 21,000 lbs. at 510 107.10 . . .

WILLIAM D. KEIR, 4 B.T.A. 41 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . credit for income and profits taxes paid to foreign countries (Dominion of Canada) in the amount of $107.10 . . .