Florida Statute 117.045 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 117
NOTARIES PUBLIC

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 117.045

117.045 Marriages.—A notary public is authorized to solemnize the rites of matrimony. For solemnizing the rites of matrimony, the fee of a notary public may not exceed those provided by law to the clerks of the circuit court for like services.

History.—s. 4, ch. 98-246.

F.S. 117.045 on Google Scholar

F.S. 117.045 on Casetext

Amendments to 117.045

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 117.045

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 117.045.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 117.045

Total Results: 20

State v. Griffin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-18

Citation: 268 So. 3d 929

Snippet: DCA 2016) ; see also McCaskill v.State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 So. 843, 843-44 (1908). Thus, the State is not

State v. Griffin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-18

Citation: 268 So. 3d 929

Snippet: DCA 2016) ; see also McCaskill v.State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 So. 843, 843-44 (1908). Thus, the State is not

Dept. of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Brown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-25

Citation: 179 So. 3d 547, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17812, 2015 WL 7568618

Snippet: performance of official duties. Sections 117.01, 117.04, 117.045, 117.05, and *550 117.103 do not apply

Colletta v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-05-09

Citation: 126 So. 3d 1090, 2012 WL 1605364, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7328

Snippet: Colletta appeals a final judgment and sentence of 117.45 months in the Department of Corrections (DOC) imposed

Beam v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-23

Citation: 1 So. 3d 331, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1879, 2009 WL 151096

Snippet: in the statute. See McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 So. 843, 845 (1908) (explaining that the age, consent

Seminole County v. Butler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-24

Citation: 676 So. 2d 451, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5315, 1996 WL 273511

Snippet: Pursuant to this formula, Mr. Wilson was awarded $117,045.20 in fees, a sum which calculates to compensation

State v. Williams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-06

Citation: 455 So. 2d 654, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14819

Snippet: acted unlawfully. See McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 So. 843 (1908); Schley v. State, 48 Fla. 53, 37

State v. Gray

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-07-21

Citation: 435 So. 2d 816

Snippet: 51 So. 278 (1910); McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 So. 843 (1908); Allen v. State, 124 So.2d 741 (Fla

Huckaby v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-02-17

Citation: 343 So. 2d 29

Snippet: and other statutes. McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 So. 843 (1908). Of course, the definitions and

Webb's City, Inc. v. Hancur

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-08-15

Citation: 144 So. 2d 319

Snippet: Florida. The early case of Smith v. Bagwell, 19 Fla. 117, 45 Am.Rep. 12, 14 (1882) stated the rule: "Compensatory

Margaret Ann Super Markets v. Dent

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-04-10

Citation: 64 So. 2d 291, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1185

Snippet: liberty. In the case of Smith v. Bagwell, 19 Fla. 117, 45 Am.Rep. 12, this court held: "`Compensatory damages

Ake v. Birnbaum

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-07-20

Citation: 25 So. 2d 213, 156 Fla. 735, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 982

Snippet: which flows from it. See Smith v. Bagwell, 19 Fla. 117, 45 Am.Rep. 12; Harby v. F. E. C. Hotel Co., 59 Fla

McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corporation

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-05-04

Citation: 13 So. 2d 221, 152 Fla. 876, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 1052

Snippet: compensatory damages. See Smith v. Bagwell, 19 Fla. 117, 45 Am. Rep. 12; Winn and Lovett Grocery Company v

Hamilton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-07-16

Citation: 182 So. 854, 133 Fla. 481, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1005

Snippet: defining the offense. McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 So. 843; Riggins v. State, 78 Fla. 459, 83 So.

Setzer v. Tyre

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-11-13

Citation: 171 So. 224, 126 Fla. 139, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1569

Snippet: such injuries. See: Smith v. Bagwell, 19 Fla. 117, 45 Am. Rep. 12; Winn Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer

Pass v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-10-31

Citation: 163 So. 583, 121 Fla. 336, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1575

Snippet: So.2d 67. See also McCaskill v. State,55 Fla. 117, 45 So.2d 843. Reversed. WHITFIELD, C.J., and TERRELL

Union Indemnity Co. v. City of New Smyrna

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-10-22

Citation: 130 So. 453, 100 Fla. 980

Snippet: Schleisenger, 114 Ohio State 323, 151 N.E. R. 117, 45 A. L. R. 371, 379, the court had under consideration

Akin v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-12-20

Citation: 86 Fla. 564, 98 So. 609

Snippet: defining the offense. McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 South. Rep. 843; Riggins v. State, 78 Fla. 439

Mercer v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-05-05

Citation: 83 Fla. 555, 92 So. 535

Snippet: 27 South, Rep. 869; McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 South. Rep. 843. It is in the discretion of the

Scarborough v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-10-22

Citation: 82 Fla. 304, 89 So. 805

Snippet: 35 South. Rep. 220; McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 South. Rep. 843. 2. There is no merit in the contention