Florida Statute 122.051 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 122
STATE AND COUNTY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 122.051

122.051 Eligibility of retired state employee for Legislature; compensation.—Any retired state employee who is presently drawing retirement benefits under any state retirement system may, as any other citizen, serve in the Legislature without affecting in any way his or her retirement status or the receipt of retirement funds while a member of the Legislature. Such person may be paid the salary of a legislator, and per diem and mileage in connection with his or her official legislative duties in addition to his or her retirement benefits during the person’s term of legislative service except that service as a legislator after retirement shall not increase retirement benefits.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-476; s. 784, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 122.051 on Google Scholar

F.S. 122.051 on Casetext

Amendments to 122.051

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 122.051

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 122.051.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 122.051

Total Results: 17

Kent v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-12-05

Citation: 702 So. 2d 265, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13615

Snippet: “razor-type knife.” See Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 So. 410 (1910) (defendant claimed that he struck

Kent v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-12-05

Citation: 702 So. 2d 265, 1997 WL 748874

Snippet: "razor-type knife." See Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 So. 410 (1910) (defendant claimed that he struck

State v. Cox

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-11-01

Citation: 306 So. 2d 156

Snippet: Appleyard v. Massachusetts, 203 U.S. 222, 27 S.Ct. 122, 51 L.Ed. 161, (1906): "... [T]he simple inquiry must

Moffett v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-10-29

Citation: 179 So. 2d 408

Snippet: 4, supra. [15] Thomas v. State, 1910, 58 Fla. 122, 51 So. 410; Chavigny v. State, Fla.App. 1959, 112

Brown v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-11-15

Citation: 184 So. 518, 135 Fla. 30, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1511

Snippet: court below is manifest. Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 South. Rep. 410. "The testimony of the State and

Stoutamire v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-08-01

Citation: 183 So. 316, 133 Fla. 757, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1040

Snippet: Fla. 317,105 So. 843; Thomas v. State, 55 Fla. 122, 51 So. 410. Often the fact that the accused was warned

Cooey v. Cooey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-06-09

Citation: 182 So. 202, 132 Fla. 716, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1819

Snippet: 285; Bath Savings Inst. v. Hawthorn, 88 Med. 122, 51 A.S.R. 382, and cases cited. So the allegations

Cawthon v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-02-11

Citation: 159 So. 366, 118 Fla. 394, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1721

Snippet: Rep. 204." And also, "Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122,51 South. Rep. 410." On authority of the opinions

Taylor v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-12-20

Citation: 158 So. 437, 117 Fla. 706, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1333

Snippet: to every intent. See Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 South. Rep. 410; Young v. State,63 Fla. 55, 58

Deiterle v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-10-22

Citation: 124 So. 47, 98 Fla. 739

Snippet: 178, 22 So. R. 298; Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 So. R. 410; Davis v. State, 105 So. R. 843, decided

Nickels v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-12-01

Citation: 106 So. 479, 90 Fla. 659

Snippet: 178,22 South. Rep. 298; Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 South. Rep. 410; Davis v. State, decided at this

Davis v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-10-08

Citation: 90 Fla. 317

Snippet: court below is manifest. Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 South. Rep. 410. The testimony of the .State and

Daviss. v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-10-08

Citation: 105 So. 843, 90 Fla. 317, 1925 Fla. LEXIS 584

Snippet: court below is manifest. Thomas v. State,58 Fla. 122, 51 South. Rep. 410. The testimony of the State and

State ex rel. Swearingen v. Railroad Commissioners

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-04-19

Citation: 79 Fla. 526

Snippet: Eng. Ency. Law (2nd ed.) p. 204; 40 South. Rep. 122; 51 L. R. A. 958; Smith v. Whitney, 116 U. S. 167.

Bates v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-12-17

Citation: 78 Fla. 672, 84 So. 373

Snippet: approved in the case of Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 South. Rep. 410, is, “If, after the introduction

Miller v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1918-01-23

Citation: 75 Fla. 136

Snippet: 34 South. Rep. 294; Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 South. Rep. 410. There is evidence that a homicide

Kersey v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-04-05

Citation: 73 Fla. 832, 74 So. 983

Snippet: out such testimony. See Thomas v. State, 58 Fla. 122, 51 South. Rep. 410, and McDonald v. State, 70 Fla