Florida Statute 137.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 137
BONDS OF COUNTY OFFICERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 137.09

137.09 Justification and approval of bonds.—Each surety upon every bond of any county officer shall make affidavit that he or she is a resident of the county for which the officer is to be commissioned, and that he or she has sufficient visible property therein unencumbered and not exempt from sale under legal process to make good his or her bond. Every such bond shall be approved by the board of county commissioners when the board is satisfied in its judgment that the bond is legal, sufficient, and proper to be approved.

History.—s. 10, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 621; GS 829; RGS 1576; CGL 2424; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 842, ch. 95-147; s. 148, ch. 2003-261; s. 4, ch. 2016-132.

F.S. 137.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 137.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 137.09

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 137.09

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 137.09.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 137.09

Total Results: 9

& SC16-124 David Beasher Snelgrove v. State of Florida and David Beasher Snelgrove v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 992

Snippet: interchangeably throughout this opinion. See § 921.137(9), Fla. Stat. (2016).

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1975-12-21T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: either two or more sureties who can comply with s. 137.09, or a surety company authorized to do business

Van Eaton v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1967-12-12T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 205 So. 2d 298

Snippet: Florida L. Rev. XIX, Number 12, Summer 1966, p. 137. [9] Piccott v. State, Fla. 1959, 116 So.2d 626. [

Bateh v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-03-31T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 101 So. 2d 869

Snippet: [8] Campbell v. State, 131 Fla. 135, 179 So. 137. [9] 148 Fla. 188, 3 So.2d 873, 874. [10] 160 Fla

Blocker v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1926-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 110 So. 547, 92 Fla. 878

Snippet: examination. See: O'Brien v. State, 25 N.E. Rep. 137; 9 L.R.A. 323. In that case the Court said: "

Ferrari v. Board of Health

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1888-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 24 Fla. 390

Snippet: to pay to the order of F. G. Renshaw, at sight, $137.09, for value received. The draft was endorsed to

Southern Express Co. v. VanMeter

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1880-06-15T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 17 Fla. 782

Snippet: ., 380; 13 Ala., 490; 37 Maine, 3461; 36 Maine, 137; 9 Conn., 275; 20 Ill. 35; 20 N. Y., 170; 1 Greenleaf

Coker v. Hayes

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1878-01-15T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 16 Fla. 368

Snippet: Mo., 380; 13 Ala., 490; 37 Maine, 346; 36 Maine, 137; 9 Conn., 275 ; 43 N. H., 65; 22 N. J. L., 372; 20

Grady v. Thigpin

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1856-01-15T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 6 Fla. 668

Snippet: memorandums of transactions as they occur.—Greenleaf Ev., 137-9, n. 1. Again, it is said “it suffices if it be within