Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE NORTEL NETWORKS INC. SNMP SNMP v., 573 B.R. 134 (Bankr. D. Del. 2017)

. . . D-155.02. . . .

C. JANOSEK Co. v. CITY OF CLEVELAND A., 718 F.3d 578 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . Cleveland, Ohio, Code § 155.02. . . .

Y. CHIANG, v. VERIZON NEW ENGLAND INC., 595 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 1692(e); see also Lapine et al., supra § 155.02, at 155-6. . . . Lapine et al., supra § 155.02, at 155-6. . . .

E. VELOZ- GERTRUDIS, v. UNITED STATES, 768 F. Supp. 38 (E.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . D.Conn.1975), aff'd, 531 F.2d 1149 (2d Cir.1976) (per curiam); 1 Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02 . . . Agency, 639 F.2d 1146, 1151 (5th Cir.1981); see generally 1 Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02 . . .

McKAY, Lt. v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a CARSON, J. v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a, 704 F.2d 444 (9th Cir. 1983)

. . . Id. at 772 (emphasis added); see also 1 Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02 at 5-66 n. 9 and . . .

In AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, 506 F. Supp. 762 (E.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . companies, of course, the Feres doctrine has no application. 1 Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02 . . . service and consequently barred under the Feres doctrine. 1 Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02 . . . the Feres doctrine will always apply in such circumstances. 1 Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02 . . . Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02 at 5-67 through 5-68. 2. . . . See 1 Jayson Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02 at 5-78 through 5-79. . . .

STEPHAN A. v. UNITED STATES,, 490 F. Supp. 323 (W.D. Mich. 1980)

. . . See also, Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 155.02. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. TRINITY UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 249 F.2d 350 (5th Cir. 1957)

. . . assessed Federal Unemployment Tax Act taxes in the amount of $620.80, together with penalty in the sum of $155.02 . . .