The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 159.12(b) (1980), became a term of the bond contract arid that failure to provide this notice constituted . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a). . . . No. 9; 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(a). . . . No. 9; 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(a). . . . See 19 U.S.C. § 1504(b); 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(e); Chemsol, 755 F.3d at 1349. . . . Under 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(a)(i), ‘‘[t]he port director may extend the 1-year statutory period for liquidation . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1), (d). . . . . § 159.12(a), (d), (e). . . . See 19 U.S.C. § 1504(b); 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(f). . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(f). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(2)(c) (2009) ("If the liquidation of an entry is suspended as required by statute or court . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1)(h). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(e), (f). . . . Id.; 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(f). Four years is not “indefinite.” . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1), (d), (e). . . . . § 159.12(b) (“If the port director extends the time for liquidation, ... he promptly will notify the . . . quantity, and amount of duty asserted by the importer of record.” 19 U.S.C. § 1504(b); accord 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . total time for which extensions may be granted by the port director may not exceed 3 years. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . filing the entry summary for consumption in proper form, with estimated duties attached. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(f). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a). . . . Notwithstanding any deficiencies in [CBP’s] attempt to extend the entries, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(c). . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(c). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(2); see also 19 U.S.C. § 1673b(d)(2). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(2); see also 19 U.S.C. § 1673b(d)(2). . . .
. . . 13 Plan provides for the payment of the current monthly mortgage payment of $757.00 and the sum of $159.12 . . .
. . . .] §§ 159.11 and 159.12, shall be deemed liquidated as of the date of expiration of the appropriate statutory . . .
. . . . § 159.12(g). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(g). . . .
. . . Under Customs regulations, “[e]xcept as provided in § 159.12, an entry not liquidated within 1 year from . . . Under 19 C.F.R. § 159.12, Customs may extend liquidation for an additional period of time under specified . . . entries to the date when NSC notified Customs of the error and that none of the exceptions under section 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(c). See Compl. ¶¶ 40-43; Pl.’s Br. 16-24. . . . U.S.A., Inc., 21 CIT at 1429. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(c) addresses the notice provision for suspensions and . . . promptly shall notify the importer. . . and his agent and surety... of the suspension.” 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . his agent and surety on Customs Form 4833-A, appropriately modified, of the suspension. 19C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . In contrast, extensions do not occur until Customs takes action by giving notice per 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(c). See Compl. ¶¶ 4(M3; Pl.’s Br. 16-24. . . . U.S.A., Inc., 991 F.Supp. 668, 21 CIT at 1429. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(c) addresses the notice provision for . . . promptly shall notify the importer ... and his agent and surety ... of the suspension.” 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . his agent and surety on Customs Form 4333-A, appropriately modified, of the suspension. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . In contrast, extensions do not occur until Customs takes action by giving notice per 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(g)). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(g)). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b) (1996)). . . . regulation, nor the governing statute, provided a consequence for the failure to send proper notice under § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b) (1996)). . . . regulation, nor the governing statute, provided a consequence for the failure to send proper notice under § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12. . . .
. . . . § 159.12. . . .
. . . . §159.12, at all relevant times in this case, Customs was required to.provide a surety with notice of . . . whether prior to the effective date of the Mod Act, December 8, 1993,19 U.S.C. §1504 and 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . Plaintiff contends, however, that even prior to December 8, 1993, 19 U.S.C. §1504 and 19 C.F.R. §159.12 . . . , appropriately modified, that the time has been extended and the reasons for doing so.” 19 C.F.R. §159.12 . . . provide the surety, Old Republic, with notices of an extension of liquidation pursuant to 19 C.F.R. §159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12, at all relevant times in this case, Customs was required to provide a surety with notice . . . Plaintiff contends, however, that even prior to December 8, 1993, 19 U.S.C. § 1504 and 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . appropriately modified, that the time has been extended and the reasons for doing so.” 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . provide the surety, Old Republic, with notices of an extension of liquidation pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . liquidation (as opposed to suspensions), the inconsistency between 19 U.S.C. § 1504 and 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . §159.12(c); (iii) that the price payable by the United States through the Bureau of Reclamation included . . . Except as provided in §159.12, an entry not liquidated within 1 year from the date of entry of the merchandise . . . asserted by the importer at the time of filing an entry summary for consumption in proper form * * *. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1) (1985). Almost no circumstance justifies a delay in liquidation beyond four years. . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1) (1985). Almost no circumstance justifies a delay in liquidation beyond four years. . . .
. . . According to the §§ 1.3(a) and (b) of the Purchase Agreement, Noble agreed to pay $13,108,-159.12 (over . . .
. . . . § 159.12(c) (1991). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1) (1985). Almost no circumstance justifies a delay in liquidation beyond four years. . . .
. . . The provisions of this section and § 159.12 shall apply to entries of merchandise for consumption or . . .
. . . The provisions of this section and § 159.12 shall apply to entries of merchandise for consumption or . . .
. . . . § 159.12(c). The deemed-liquidated statute, 19 U.S.C. § 1504, was enacted in 1978. . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b), (c) (1997), which require action by Customs to accomplish an "extension” of liquidation . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b), (c) (1997), which require action by Customs to accomplish an “extension" of liquidation . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b)-(d) (1985) (if liquidation is extended or suspended, the importer must be notified promptly . . . 131, 1996 WL 467736 (CIT Aug. 13, 1996), the Court relied on 19 U.S.C. § 1504 (1988) and 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . , appropriately modified, that the time has been extended and the reasons for doing so. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12 (b)-(d) (1985) (ifliquidation is extended or suspended, the importer must be notified promptly . . . States, Slip Op. 96-131 (CIT Aug. 13,1996), the Court relied on 19 U.S.C.§ 1504 (1988) and 19 C.ER.§ 159.12 . . . , appropriately modified, that the time has been extended and the reasons for doing so. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . In holding sections 113.44(a) and 159.12(b) of Title 19, C.F.R., relating to extension of time and notice . . .
. . . . § 159.12 (1987). . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1). . . . . § 159.12(b). . . . the district director shall notify the surety of an extension “on Customs Form 4333-A.” . 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(3). . . . state, the region is located in a state that has an effective siting program, as determined under § 159.12 . . . the final sentence of § 159.11(1), Wis.Stats., and the effective siting requirement found at section 159.12 . . . the final sentence of§ 159.11(1), Wis.Stats., and the effective siting requirement found at section 159.12 . . .
. . . Extension of Liquidations * * * b) That defendants did not comply with the requirements of 19 CFR § 159.12 . . . Sec. 1504 (b) and Sec. 159.12 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR Sec. 159.12) clearly encompasses Plaintiffs . . . one of the causes of action as alleging “defendants did not comply with the requirements of 19 CFR § 159.12 . . .
. . . appropriate Customs Regulation as it existed at the time of the alleged extension is set out as follows: § 159.12 . . . , appropriately modified, that the time has been extended and the reasons for doing so. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . this Court was whether the notice issued to Intereargo complied with 19 U.S.C. § 1504 and 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . appropriate Customs Regulation as it existed at the time of the alleged extension is set out as follows: § 159.12 . . . , appropriately modified, that the time has been extended and the reasons for doing so. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . this Court was whether the notice issued to Intercargo complied with 19 U.S.C. § 1504 and 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1), (b), (d) and (e) (1993). . . . Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(b) (1992), St. . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a) & (e) (1991). . . . See Appendix for schedule of dates of entry, extensions, and liquidation. . 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(a) & ( . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a) & (e) (1991). . . . See Appendix for schedule of dates of entry, extensions, and liquidation. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(a) & (e) . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(l)(i). . . . notice on Custom Form 4333-A, and the notice shall state the reason for the extension. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(a). . . . record requests such extension and shows good cause therefor. 19 U.S.C. § 1504(b) (1988). 19 CFR § 159.12 . . . The 1-year liquidation period may be suspended as required by statute or court order. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(a)(1)(i). . . . notice on Customs Form 4333-A, and the notice shall state the reason for the extension. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 159.12(a). . . . record requests such extension and shows good cause therefor. 19 U.S.C. § 1504(b) (1988). 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . The 1-year liquidation period may be suspended as required by statute or court order. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b) (1991). . . . importers with “courtesy notice” that shall not serve as formal notice, the language of 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . They seek alternative priorities for $999,265.55, less $56,-159.12 if a constructive trust is imposed . . . Plaintiffs' exhibit “B” shows that funds totalling $56,-159.12 have been traced from the Atlanta Account . . .
. . . . § 159.12 (1985). . 19 U.S.C. § 1504(a) (1982); see Old Republic, 8 C.I.T. at 3. . . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b) (1980). I. . . . The key questions, then, are whether 19 C.F.R. §§ 113.44(a) and 159.12(b) create rights of the parties . . . On its face, section 159.12(b) creates an unconditional obligation of the government to notify sureties . . . Having determined that section 159.12(b) is a term of the bond, the court must now consider the impact . . . The court has recently considered the relationship between 19 U.S.C. § 1504(b) and 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b) (1980). . . . * * he promptly shall notify the importer or the consignee and his agent and surety * * 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . The key questions, then, are whether 19 C.F.R. §§ 113.44(a) and 159.12(b) create rights of the parties . . . Having determined that section 159.12(b) is a term of the bond, the court must now consider the impact . . . The court has recently considered the relationship between 19 U.S.C. § 1504(b) and 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . .
. . . . §§ 159.11(a) and 159.12(f); Detroit Zoological Society v. . . .
. . . . §§ 159.11(a) and 159.12(0; Detroit Zoological Society v. United States, 10 CIT 133, 630 F. . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b) (1984), and the court will, therefore, analyze the alleged extensions solely in light of . . . .. he promptly shall notify the importer or the consignee and his agent and surety____” 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . Section 159.12(b) of the regulations (quoted above) would seem to require notices to the importer or . . . does not reach the question of what the Secretary actually intended to require pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . On its face section 159.12(b) does not mesh easily with the definitional regulation, 19 C.F.R. § 101. . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b) (1984), and the court will, therefore, analyze the alleged extensions solely in light of . . . 1982), and the regulations state that each individual extension is not to exceed one year. 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . * * he promptly shall notify the importer or the consignee and his agent and surety * * 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . Section 159.12(b) of the regulations (quoted above) would seem to require notices to the importer or . . . On its face section 159.12(b) does not mesh easily with the definitional regulation, 19 C.F.R. § 101. . . .
. . . . § 159.12(b) and (c), which differentiate between notice of suspension and notice of extension. . . . Section 159.12(b) specifically states that “[i]f the district director extends the time for liquidation . . . The relevant regulations, published at 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 (1982) provide: § 159.12 Extension of time . . .
. . . . § 159.12 (b) and (c), which differentiate between notice of suspension and notice of extension. . . . Section 159.12(b) specifically states that "[i]f the district director extends the time for liquidation . . . The relevant regulations, published at 19 C.F.R. §159.12 (1982) provide: § 159.12 Extension of time for . . .
. . . . § 159.12, to notify it of the extension of liquidation. . . . to Customs’ failure to send it a notice of extension of liquidation, as required by by 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 . . . In this connection, 19 C.F.R. § 159.12 authorizes Customs to extend the one-year statutory period for . . .
. . . parties have agreed that with respect to five of the items in question, designated as Items No. 4 ($159.12 . . .
. . . The amounts expended therefor alleged in Count I ranged from $159.12 to $1,127.10, totaling $5,509.62 . . .
. . . aforesaid payment of $6848.64, a balance remained of $5304.06, which, with a federal tax thereon of $159.12 . . . defendant became liable to the plaintiff in the amount of $5304.06, plus a federal tax thereon of $159.12 . . .