Cases from cite.case.law:

K. HARLOW, v. J. ASTRUE,, 610 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (D. Neb. 2009)

. . . Dec. 2005 (196.8) 13.50 158.00 2,133.00 Jan. 2006 (198.3) 0.20 159.20 31.84 Feb. 2006 (198.7) 0.60 159.52 . . .

APONTE, v. R. NICHOLSON,, 21 Vet. App. 470 (Vet. App. 2007)

. . . Goldberg and billed at the rate of $159.52 per hour; (2) 14.6 hours for “Paralegal work” performed by . . . came to the total of 23.4 hours and it is not clear whether all such hours were billed at the rate of $159.52 . . .

LAUBE, v. F. ALLEN,, 506 F. Supp. 2d 969 (M.D. Ala. 2007)

. . . Attorney Hanlon 76.82 $ 169.50 / hr $ 13,020.99 Attorney Kung 43.53 $ 169.50 / hr $ 7,378.34 Attorney Rohr 159.52 . . .

R. PURDY, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,, 10 F. App'x 900 (Fed. Cir. 2001)

. . . $15,792.00, and that OPM would recoup the overpayment by reducing his monthly disability benefits by $159.52 . . .

In J. NUNALLY, J. NUNALLY, v. BARICK FURNITURE COMPANY, 103 B.R. 376 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1989)

. . . . §§ 547 and 522(h); and (2) $159.52 of the funds were attached after the filing of the debtor’s petition . . .

FOX v. X. McLAUGHLIN H., 195 F. Supp. 774 (W.D. Pa. 1961)

. . . In addition, the claim for money as to defendant Schoyer only amounts to $5,-159.52.- This is less than . . .