The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 159
BOND FINANCING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 159.62

159.62 Liabilities of a housing finance authority.—In no event shall the liabilities, whether ex contractu or ex delicto, of a housing finance authority arising from the financing of any qualifying housing development be payable from any funds other than the revenues or receipts of such qualifying housing development.

History.—s. 20, ch. 78-89.

F.S. 159.62 on Google Scholar

F.S. 159.62 on Casetext

Amendments to 159.62

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 159.62

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 159.62.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

TRUTH FOUNDATION MINISTRIES, NFP, v. VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 896 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . Code, Section 159.60, Land Use Chart; Section 159.61(C)(6) (E-R, Estate Residential District); Section 159.62 . . . Code, Section 159.60, Land Use Chart; Section 159.61(C)(6) (E-R, Estate Residential District); Section 159.62 . . .

v. Xl P. F., 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 294 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . . § 159.62(a) (2009). . . .

SIOUX HONEY ASSOCIATION, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, XL P. Of Of F., 700 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . . § 159.62(a) (2009). . . .

B. B. v. U. S. W. U. S., 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 560 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . . § 159.62(a). . . .

SOUTHERN SHRIMP ALLIANCE, B. B v. UNITED STATES, U. S. W. U. S., 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . . § 159.62(a). . . .

SKF USA, INC. v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U. S. C. R., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 159.62(a). . . . Id. § 159.62(b)(2). . . .

DIXON TICONDEROGA COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 468 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 159.62(a), we reverse. . . . by regulation to publish the Notice at least 90 days before the end of the fiscal year. 19 C.F.R. § 159.62 . . . International Trade (and to us) that Customs’ failure to provide notice as required by 19 C.F.R. § 159.62 . . . The Court of International Trade concluded that the timing requirements of 19 C.F.R. § 159.62(a) were . . . No. 106-387, § 1(a), 114 Stat. 1549 (2000), the purpose of 19 C.F.R. § 159.62(a) is simply to provide . . .

GUANGDONG CHEMICALS IMPORT EXPORT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 414 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . . § 159.62(a) (2003), which requires a notice of intent to distribute funds obtained pursuant to anti-dumping . . .

v., 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 85 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . . § 159.62(a) (2003), which requires a notice of intent to distribute funds obtained pursuant to antidumping . . .

v. C., 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 913 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . . § 159.62(a), were designed to protect this interest. . . . Cir. 2005), the Federal Circuit considered a case where Customs complied with 19 C.F.R. § 159.62(a) and . . . Dixon was an intended beneficiary of the CDSOA and its accompanying regulations, including 19 C.F.R. § 159.62 . . .

DIXON TICONDEROGA COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION C., 366 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . . § 159.62(a) constitutes a mere procedural guideline, Dixon’s motion is granted because the court finds . . . the Notice of Intent to Distribute at least 90 days before the end of the fiscal year. 19 C.F.R. § 159.62 . . . Dixon argued to Customs that Customs’ own failure to provide notice as required by 19 C.F.R. § 159.62 . . . uncontested that Customs failed to timely comply with the regulatory notice requirement of section 159.62 . . . Section 159.62(a) states: At least 90 days before the end of a fiscal year, Customs will publish in the . . .

v. C., 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 406 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

CATHEDRAL CANDLE COMPANY A. I. v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION C., 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 159.62-63 (2004). Here the claimants did not file within the 60-day period. . . .

In BARNES, Sr. BARNES, v. McCARTHY,, 29 B.R. 677 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 1983)

. . . The sum of $159.62 which had been withheld from Plaintiff’s wages was paid over to the Defendant on October . . .

CHARLES B. WRIGHTSMAN AND JAYNE WRIGHTSMAN v. THE UNITED STATES, 192 Ct. Cl. 722 (Ct. Cl. 1970)

. . . They reported on the 1960 tax return “Lease Rental and Miscellaneous” income of $159.62 for the year . . .

MANDELL, SPECTOR, RUDOLPH CO. v. UNITED STATES, 364 F.2d 889 (3d Cir. 1966)

. . . the comparisons disclosed discrepancies ranging from an underpayment of $840.26 to an overpayment of $159.62 . . .