Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 163.64 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 163.64 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 163.64

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 163
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 163.64
163.64 Sharing of client information.Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, an agency that participates in the creation or administration of a collaborative client information system may share client information, including confidential client information, with other members of the collaborative system as long as the restrictions governing the confidential information are observed by any other agency granted access to the confidential information. An agency that participates in a collaborative information system is not required to have a release signed by its affected clients before sharing confidential information with other members of the collaborative system.
History.s. 46, ch. 97-286.

F.S. 163.64 on Google Scholar

F.S. 163.64 on Casetext

Amendments to 163.64


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 163.64
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 163.64.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 163.64

Total Results: 20

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Limiting Government Interference with Abortion

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-04-01T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: U.S. 215, 301 (2022); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 163-64 (1973), overruled by Dobbs, 597 U.S. 215, and

Hull v. Hull

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-05-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 273 So. 3d 1135

Snippet: statute is de novo. Brooks v. Brooks , 164 So.3d 162, 163-64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (citing B.Y. v. Dep't of

Hull v. Hull

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-05-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 273 So. 3d 1135

Snippet: statute is de novo. Brooks v. Brooks , 164 So.3d 162, 163-64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (citing B.Y. v. Dep't of

Treneka Simmonds v. Connor Perkins

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-06-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 247 So. 3d 397

Snippet: , Eldridge , 16 So.2d at 163-64 . The presumption was intentionally very strong

Joel Lebron v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-12-20T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: database. See Murray v. State, 692 So. 2d 157, 163-64 (Fla. 1997) (evidence not admissible when based

State of Florida v. Brian Mitchell Lee

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-06-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 223 So. 3d 342, 2017 WL 2374401, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7886

Snippet: were challenged on double jeopardy grounds. Id. at 163-64. Acknowledging that sections 847.0135(3) and 847.0135

MATTHEW JOSEPH DETTLE v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-05-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 226 So. 3d 285

Snippet: were challenged on double jeopardy grounds. Id. at 163-64. Acknowledging that sections 847.0135(3) and 847.0135

John Doe v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 1020, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 553, 2017 WL 1954981, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1057

Snippet: by video. Id. at 31-32. *1031Doe, 210 So.3d at 163-64 (Wallace, J., concurring) (citation omitted). Indeed

Guardian ad Litem Program ex rel. A.E. v. Department of Children & Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-12-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 207 So. 3d 1000

Snippet: such a scenario: *1005J.C. v. K.K., 64 So.3d 157, 163-64 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Similar to the father in J.C

Timmons v. Timmons

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 179 So. 3d 380

Snippet: novo. Brooks v. Brooks, 164 So.3d 162, 163-64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). The former wife has not provided

Miller v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 177 So. 3d 95

Snippet: citing Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161, 163-64, 165 (Fla. 1988)). 2D14-3728 District

& SC13-1028 License Acquisitions, LLC v. Debary Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. Debary Real Estate Holdings, LLC

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-12-03T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: regulation are considered. Debary, 112 So. 3d at 163-64 (citing Biscayne Kennel Club, Inc. v. Florida

MESSER v. SANDER

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-07-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 144 So. 3d 566

Snippet: the party failed to establish necessity. Id. at 163-64. Furthermore, in the Parham case cited by the trial

Young v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-04-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 137 So. 3d 532

Snippet: — and therefore, any error was harmless. Id. at 163-64; see also State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129,1135

Madson v. Madson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-12-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 128 So. 3d 207

Snippet: (2010); see also McKee v. Mick, 120 So.3d 162, 163-64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (finding that the trial court…61.075(1), (6)(b), Fla. Stat.; McKee, 120 So.3d at 163-64; Tradler, 100 So.3d at 743; Capozza, 917 So.2d

SP Healthcare Holdings, LLC v. Surgery Center Holdings, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-03-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 110 So. 3d 87

Snippet: first receiving the court’s permission. Id. at 163-64. The court later denied the plaintiffs’ request

Richardson v. Cervone ex rel. D.O.C.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 116 So. 3d 449

Snippet: relationship with the real party in interest.” Id. at 163-64, 110 S.Ct. 1717. The burden is on the “next friend

Moore v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-12-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 127 So. 3d 607

Snippet: at 280 (citing State v. Perkins, 349 So.2d 161, 163-64 (Fla.1977)). In Perez v. State, 801 So.2d 276 (

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 & 3.851

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2011-06-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 72 So. 3d 735

Snippet: Amendments to Fla. Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.851, 1 So.3d at 163-64. Pursuant to that referral, the three committees

Florida Department of Revenue v. Seminole Tribe of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-06-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 65 So. 3d 1094

Snippet: of Indian-owned vehicles on tribal lands. Id. at 163-64, 100 S.Ct. 2069. The Court suggested, however,