Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 180.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 180.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 180.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 180
MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 180.10
180.10 When election necessary.Where any mortgage revenue certificates, debentures, or other evidences of indebtedness shall come within the purview of s. 12, Art. VII of the State Constitution, the same shall be issued only after having been approved by a majority of the votes cast in an election in which a majority of the owners of freeholds not wholly exempt from taxation who are qualified electors residing in such municipality shall participate, pursuant to the provisions of ss. 100.201-100.221, 100.241, 100.261-100.341, and 100.351.
History.s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945; s. 15, ch. 69-216; s. 64, ch. 77-175.

F.S. 180.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 180.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 180.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 180.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 180.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

NNEBE, v. DAUS, v., 931 F.3d 66 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 180.10 (felonies). . . .

W. DEARSTYNE, v. MAZZUCA,, 48 F. Supp. 3d 222 (N.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Law § 180.10(3). . . .

ROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS, 554 U.S. 191 (U.S. 2008)

. . . . § 180.10 (West 2007); (30) North Carolina: see N. C. Gen. Stat. . . .

KRIMSTOCK, v. W. KELLY,, 306 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 180.10, a misdemeanor charge of DWI requires no post-arrest determination of probable cause, id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ZICHETTELLO, J., 208 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2000)

. . . NYPL § 180.10 defines a labor official as, inter alia, “any duly appointed representative of a labor . . .

L. FINCHER, v. THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, J., 979 F. Supp. 989 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . . §§ 180.10, 180.60, 180.70 (McKinney 1993). . . . .

MURPHY, v. LYNN, a a a a, 118 F.3d 938 (2d Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 180.10 practice commentaries (McKinney 1993), or a “misdemeanor complaint” or an “information” for . . .

R. MARSHALL, v. F. SULLIVAN, a BFP a J. a a a a F. a, 105 F.3d 47 (2d Cir. 1996)

. . . In December 1992, a felony hearing, see N.Y.Crim.Pro.Law §§ 180.10-180.80 (McKinney 1993), was held before . . .

HARRIS TRUST COMPANY OF FLORIDA, V. A. II, v. A. DAVIS a k a, 668 So. 2d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . damages, which were not barred by the statute because never disclosed by way of accounting, the $70,-180.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION,, 847 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1988)

. . . Work on Fee Petition (5/20/86-9/18/86) (see n. 6, supra) 180.10 hours ±70.00 hours $70/hour $5,000 8. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. WARD, J. I., 845 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1988)

. . . Law §§ 180.10(2), 180.60 (McKinney 1982). . . .

MORANO, v. DILLON,, 746 F.2d 942 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 180.10 (McKinney 1982) seems to require that a court provide a preliminary hearing on a felony complaint . . . at the request of the defendant, section 180.10 has been construed by lower state courts to vest the . . . Galak, 114 Misc.2d 719, 452 N.Y.S.2d 795 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1982) (construing § 180.10 in light of N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law . . . Crim.Proc.Law § 180.10. This request was denied by the district attorney of the County of Nassau. . . . N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 180.10 provides in part: 1. . . .

SOLOMON, v. J. SMITH,, 645 F.2d 1179 (2d Cir. 1981)

. . . Crim.Proc.Law §§ 1.20(1), (8), (17); 100.05; 170.10(1); 180.10(1) (McKinney 1971, 1980 Supp.); People . . .

BEARY, v. CITY OF RYE,, 601 F.2d 62 (2d Cir. 1979)

. . . . §§ 180.10, 180.60 (McKinney). . . .

TAYLOR, v. PHILIPS INDUSTRIES, INC., 593 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1979)

. . . After being made Warehouse Foreman at Philips’ General Processing Division, Taylor received $180.10 per . . .

FRANKOS, v. J. LaVALLEE,, 535 F.2d 1346 (2d Cir. 1976)

. . . . § 180.10(3)(c). . . .

A. M. v., 40 T.C. 896 (T.C. 1963)

. . . Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in income tax for the calendar year 1958 in the amount of $180.10 . . .

BURKE. BURKE v. HURNEY GLIDE v. SAME, 4 F. Cas. 735 (C.C.D. Mass. 1878)

. . . entered a final ■decree in the case of the steam-tug Burke, that the libellant do recover the sum of $180.10 . . .