Florida Statute 180.17 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES

Chapter 180
MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 180.17

180.17 Contracts with private companies.—Any municipality may contract by and through its duly authorized officers with any private company or corporation which is organized for any purpose related to the provisions of this chapter, and may contract with said private company or corporation for the construction or use of such works authorized by this chapter.

History.—s. 11, ch. 17118, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 3100(16).

F.S. 180.17 on Google Scholar

F.S. 180.17 on Casetext

Amendments to 180.17

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 180.17

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 180.17.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 180.17

Total Results: 9

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-04-07

Snippet: systems and sanitary sewers (ss. 180.04,180.06(4), 180.17, F.S.; s. 184.03(1), F.S. 1971), and to enter into

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1980-05-15

Snippet: private companies or corporations. See ss. 180.14, 180.17, and180.20. Or, pursuant to s. 166.042(1), F. S

Jackson v. ALTERMAN TRANSPORT LINES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-10-08

Citation: 301 So. 2d 795

Snippet: complaint. Goldfarb v. Bronston, 1944, 154 Fla. 180, 17 So.2d 300; Raphael v. Carner, Fla.App. 1967, 194

Talmudical Academy of Baltimore v. Harris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-07-28

Citation: 238 So. 2d 161, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5923

Snippet: interlocutory. Goldfarb v. Bronston, 154 Fla. 180, 17 So.2d 300 (1944); Morse v. Hendry Corporation,

Bailey v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-02-05

Citation: 218 So. 2d 761, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6304

Snippet: and Goldfarb v. Bronston et al. (1944), 154 Fla. 180, 17 So.2d 300. . State ex rel. Royal Ins. Co. v.

Raphael v. Carner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-01-17

Citation: 194 So. 2d 298

Snippet: complaint. Goldfarb v. Bronston, 1944, 154 Fla. 180, 17 So.2d 300; Morse v. Hendry Corporation, Fla.App

Southern Railway Company v. Bowling

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-04-24

Citation: 129 So. 2d 433

Snippet: dismissed. See *439 Goldfarb v. Bronston, 154 Fla. 180, 17 So.2d 300. In denying the motion, the court is

Howard v. Ziegler

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1949-05-27

Citation: 40 So. 2d 776, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1414

Snippet: Hayner, 22 Fla. 325; Goldfarb v. Bronston, 154 Fla. 180, 17 So.2d 300. It is plain that the stipulation entered

Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Simon

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1908-06-15

Citation: 56 Fla. 545

Snippet: Process of Law, 56 et seq; Jones v. Brim, 165 U. S. 180, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 282; In re Van Horne, N. J. L. ,