Cases from cite.case.law:

EPPS CHEVROLET COMPANY, d b a v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., 99 F. Supp. 3d 692 (E.D. Ky. 2015)

. . . See KRS § 190.047(2). . . . KRS §§ 190.045, 190.047. . . . KRS, § 190.047(1). . . . KRS § 190.047(2); see also KRS § 190.070(2)(m) (providing that a manufacturer may not “fail to give consent . . .

FIRESIDE NISSAN, INC. v. P. FANNING,, 30 F.3d 206 (1st Cir. 1994)

. . . .-015; 190.047(7)(b). . . . .

C. BLAIR v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,, 838 F. Supp. 1196 (W.D. Ky. 1993)

. . . Norden Lab., 669 F.2d 1286, 1290 (6th Cir.1982) KRS 190.047 regulates the transfer of motor vehicle sales . . . KRS 190.047(2). The manufacturer responds to the dealer. Id. . . . KRS 190.047(4). . . . From the Court’s examination of KRS 190.047, as applied here, the statute was designed and written to . . . The statute provides in part as follows: KRS 190.047. . . .

BMW STORES, INC. v. PEUGEOT MOTORS OF AMERICA, INC., 860 F.2d 212 (6th Cir. 1988)

. . . (KRSA) § 190.047(6). . . . The issue in this case is whether the limitations imposed by § 190.047(6) apply when the existing dealership . . . We conclude that § 190.047(6) does not apply under these facts because we conclude that the Kentucky . . . Although application of § 190.047 as plaintiff desires may benefit an out-of-state party because the . . . In this ease, application of Ky.Rev.Stat. § 190.047 at the behest of BMW would protect the property and . . .