Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-07-12T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 96 So. 3d 412, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 449, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1365, 2012 WL 2849485
Snippet: in Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147, 80 S.Ct. 215, 4 L.Ed.2d 205 (1959), the Supreme Court determined
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-08-25T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 45 So. 3d 836, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20776, 2010 WL 3324938
Snippet: 77.3 inches x 58.3 inches) and a Lincoln Town Car (215.4 inches x 78.5 inches x 59 inches). In fact, the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-08-25T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 62 So. 3d 625, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12416, 2010 WL 6570552
Snippet: 77.3 inches x 58.3 inches) and a Lincoln Town Car (215.4 inches x 78.5 inches x 59 inches). In fact, the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-08-22T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 62 So. 3d 604, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13015, 2007 WL 7548631
Snippet: (w) x 58.3 inches (h)) and a Lincoln Town Car (215.4 inches (Z) x 78.5 inches (w) X 59 inches (h)). This
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-01-26T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 947 So. 2d 1212
Snippet: newly renumbered Rule of Judicial Administration 2.215(4), “[t]he chief judge shall assign judges to the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-01-25T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 947 So. 2d 1212
Snippet: newly renumbered Rule of Judicial Administration 2.215(4), "[t]he chief judge shall assign judges to
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-11-02T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 941 So. 2d 484, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18416, 2006 WL 3095552
Snippet: as well as precedent from this court. See § 985.215(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005); State v. Lopez, 748 So.2d…39.044(4)(a) has been renumbered as section 985.215(4)(a) of the Florida Statutes. No. 3D06-2615
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-10-06T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 884 So. 2d 446, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14821
Snippet: foreclosure judgment required the mortgagor to pay $215,004.20 and set an April 30, 2003, sale date, if the
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-03-25T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 875 So. 2d 383
Snippet: husband's parental rights. Perlow, 816 So.2d at 215. [4] The record does not reflect that the trial judge
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-06-30T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 851 So. 2d 214
Snippet: investment vehicles and providers, etc. E.g. § 112.215(4)(a), Fla. Stat. In accordance with this procedure…administered in accordance with the plan. § 112.215(4)(b) and (d), Fla. Stat. The statute further permits…provision of compensation for these services. § 112.215(4)(c), Fla. Stat. This was done, with several administrative
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-06-23T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 737 So. 2d 574, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8346, 1999 WL 415188
Snippet: of judgment. Id. (citing Argonaut, 474 So.2d at 215).4 In this case, the actual verdict form shows that
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-03-09T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 727 So. 2d 404
Snippet: incarcerated adults, including trustees." § 985.215(4), Florida Stat. (1997).[2] Obviously, then, the
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-11-12T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 609 So. 2d 21, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 697, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1935, 1992 WL 332712
Snippet: clients. Judgment for costs in the amount of $7,215.04 hereby is entered against Bor-ja, for which sum
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-03-30T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 544 So. 2d 219
Snippet: materials. Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147, 80 S.Ct. 215, 4 L.Ed.2d 205 (1959). We hold that the level of self-censorship
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-05-18T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 524 So. 2d 671
Snippet: Appellants, v. Harriet R. SITOMER, Appellee. Nos. 4-86-0215, 4-86-0844, 4-86-0285 and 4-86-0967. District Court…petitions for rehearing are denied. 4-86-0215, 4-86-0844, 4-86-0285 and 4-86-0967 District Court
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-02-10T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 524 So. 2d 671, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 391, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 437, 1988 WL 8095
Snippet: C.J., and STONE, J., concur. Nos. 4-86-0215, 4-86-0844, 4-86-0285 and 4-86-0967 District Court
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-06-21T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 436 So. 2d 213
Snippet: $40,000 it had paid, asserting the following *215 four theories of action in separate counts: 1. Consolidated
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-07-21T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 417 So. 2d 287
Snippet: rights, Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147, 80 S.Ct. 215, 4 L.Ed.2d 205 (1959); nor does the statute violate…e.g., Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147, 80 S.Ct. 215, 4 L.Ed.2d 205 (1959) (statute making it illegal to
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-02-01T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 411 So. 2d 212
Snippet: inapplicable to motorcycles. But as Section 316.215(4) so plainly states: "The provisions of this
Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1980-04-23T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: has approved for implementation pursuant to s.112.215(4)(a). Under s. 112.215(6)(a), the State Treasurer