Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 215.58 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 215.58 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 215.58

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 215.58
215.58 Definitions relating to State Bond Act.The following words or terms when used in this act shall have the following meanings:
(1) “Governor” means the Governor of the state or any Acting Governor or other person then exercising the duties of the office of Governor.
(2) “State” means the State of Florida.
(3) “Division” means the Division of Bond Finance.
(4) “Board” means the governing board of the division, which shall be composed of the Governor and Cabinet.
(5) “Director” means the chief administrator of the division, who shall act on behalf of the division when authorized by the board, as provided by this act.
(6) “State agency” means any board, commission, authority, or other state agency heretofore or hereafter created by the constitution or statutes of the state.
(7) “Bonds” means state bonds, or any revenue bonds, certificates or other obligations heretofore or hereafter authorized to be issued by said division or by any state agency.
(8) “State bonds” means bonds pledging the full faith and credit of the State of Florida.
(9) “Legislature” means the State Legislature.
(10) “Constitution” means the existing constitution of the state, or any constitution hereafter adopted by the people of the state, together with all amendments thereof.
(11) “Original issue discount” means the amount by which the par value of a bond exceeds its public offering price at the time it is originally offered to an investor.
(12) “Governmental agency” means:
(a) The state or any department, commission, agency, or other instrumentality thereof.
(b) Any county or municipality or any department, commission, agency, or other instrumentality thereof.
(c) Any school board or special district, authority, or governmental entity.
History.s. 2, ch. 69-230; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 87-308; s. 4, ch. 89-287; s. 151, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 84, ch. 99-2; s. 225, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 215.58 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.58 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.58


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.58
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.58.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 215.58

Total Results: 6

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2011-06-16

Snippet: Planning and Land Development Regulation Act); s. 215.58(12), Fla. Stat. (State Bond Act); and s. 961.06(5)

Barclay v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-01-04

Citation: 629 So. 2d 1065, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12, 1994 WL 1271

Snippet: (Fla.1977), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 877, 99 S.Ct. 215, 58 L.Ed.2d 191 (1978); Garbett v. State, 484 So.2d

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-07-07

Snippet: taxes, revenues, or any other source. See also s. 215.58(10), F.S. (State Bond Act), s. 159.27(1), F.S.

Haydon v. Weltmer, Et Vir

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-04-04

Citation: 187 So. 772, 137 Fla. 130, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1797

Snippet: between the parties. See Doggett v. Hart, 5 Fla. 215, 58 Am. Dec. 464; Sommers v. Apalachicola Northern

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Brown

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-04-04

Citation: 160 So. 657, 119 Fla. 610

Snippet: St. Rep. 171. See also, Doggett v. Hart, 5 Fla. 215, 58 Am. Dec. 464; El Modello Cigar Mfg. Co. v. Gate

Capital City Bank v. Hilson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1912-06-15

Citation: 64 Fla. 206

Snippet: St. Rep. 171. See also Doggett v. Hart, 5 Fla. 215, 58 Amer. Dec. 464; El Modello Cigar Mfg. Co. v. Gato