Florida Statute 215.66 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 215.66

215.66 Request for issuance of bonds; procedure requirements.—

(1) Before any bonds may be issued by the division on behalf of a state agency, such state agency shall file a request with the division by appropriate resolution for approval of the issuance of such proposed bonds, which request shall state such facts and shall have annexed thereto such exhibits in regard to such bonds and to such state agency and its financial condition as may be required by the division.

(2) In any case in which any bonds proposed by any state agency shall be required by the constitution or statutes to be submitted to the qualified electors or qualified electors who are freeholders for approval or disapproval at a bond election prior to the issuance of such bonds, the request shall be filed with the division at least 60 days prior to the date of the holding of such proposed bond election. No such bond election shall be held on the question of the issuance of such bonds until the Legislature has approved the holding of such bond election.

History.—s. 11, ch. 69-230.

F.S. 215.66 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.66 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.66

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.66

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.66.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 215.66

Total Results: 12

State v. DuFresne

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-01-24

Citation: 782 So. 2d 888, 2001 WL 55921

Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980)(citing Dandridge v. Williams

State v. Baal

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-10-02

Citation: 680 So. 2d 608, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10291, 1996 WL 556591

Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980). Instead, because the circuit

State v. Olson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-09-20

Citation: 586 So. 2d 1239, 1991 WL 187311

Snippet: 1980), [cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980)]; Tribune Company v. Huffstetler

Northwestern, Inc. v. Ward Land Clearing & Drainage, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-12-23

Citation: 500 So. 2d 615, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 52, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10996

Snippet: directing Northwestern and USF & G to pay Ward $6,215.66, an attorney’s fee of $3,750, and costs of $139

State v. Saiez

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-06-12

Citation: 489 So. 2d 1125, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 262

Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980). This doctrine operates as an

State v. Greco

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-11-15

Citation: 479 So. 2d 786, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2554

Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980). Unlike the usual case, a person

State v. Short

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-10-25

Citation: 483 So. 2d 10, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2410

Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980). Falsification of official records

Agudo, Pineiro & Kates v. Harbert Const.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-09-17

Citation: 476 So. 2d 1311, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2183

Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980); Pace v. State, 368 So.2d 340

SE FISHERIES v. Dept. of Nat. Resources

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-26

Citation: 453 So. 2d 1351

Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980) (citing Dandridge v. Williams

Preferred Risk Life Ins. Co. v. Sande

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-09-29

Citation: 421 So. 2d 566

Snippet: judgment for the Sandes in the total sum of $2,215.66. No explanation for the finding is seen in the

Deehl v. Knox

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-05-11

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1089

Snippet: 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980); Trushin v. State, 384 So.2d

Tenney v. STATE COM'N ON ETHICS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-03-25

Citation: 395 So. 2d 1244

Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980). There the supreme court stated