Florida Statute 217.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 217
SURPLUS PROPERTY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 217.02

217.02 Definitions.—As used in this act, the term:

(1) “Department” means the Department of Management Services.

(2) “Surplus property” means any federal property which has been declared excess by a federal agency, including the Department of Defense, and made available for procurement and distribution in the state in compliance with the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, and subsequent amendments thereto, or any other federal law provided for the procurement and distribution of federal excess and surplus property.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-173; ss. 22, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 49, ch. 71-377; s. 162, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 30, ch. 94-226.

F.S. 217.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 217.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 217.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 217.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 217.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 217.02

Total Results: 20

Simmons v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-22

Snippet: concurring) (citation omitted); see also §§ 581.217(2)(a), (b) ("The Legislature finds that . .

JASON HASSAN BAXTER vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-10-27

Snippet: Fla. Stat. (2019). Under section 581.217(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2021), “[h]emp-derived

Fernandez v. Basil Yates, M.D., P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-06-18

Citation: 145 So. 3d 141, 2014 WL 2756526, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9225

Snippet: (citing News-Journal Corporation v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941)), the Court observed “the drastic

Delong v. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-05-28

Citation: 145 So. 3d 123, 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 700, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8115, 2014 WL 2199805

Snippet: dismissed at the agency head’s discretion. § 110.217(2) Fla. Stat. An employee on probationary status attains

Grandini v. Carizo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-02-02

Citation: 891 So. 2d 1216, 2005 WL 236535

Snippet: (Fla.1949); News-Journal Corp. v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941); Bochterle v. Florida Milk Co

Standard Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-05-05

Citation: 636 So. 2d 502, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 244, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 654, 1994 WL 164596

Snippet: established in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.217. 2. The committee recommends a new instruction on

Cohen v. Hattaway

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-02-07

Citation: 595 So. 2d 105, 1992 WL 18554

Snippet: opportunity. News-Journal Corporation v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941); Pan American Trading & Trapping

Wackenhut Corp. v. Lippert

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-10-30

Citation: 591 So. 2d 215, 1991 WL 98037

Snippet: elsewhere before or after the passenger's trip. *217 2) Exclusions From Liability e) DL is not responsible

Uvanile v. Denoff

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-07-23

Citation: 495 So. 2d 1177, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1603

Snippet: cites News-Journal Corporation v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941). Farber acknowledged the doctrine

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1986-01-16

Snippet: And see, Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1966). Thus, it appears that the Legislature

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-12-16

Snippet: possible. Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1966), citing 82 C.J.S. Statutes s

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-09-09

Snippet: See also, Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966); 82 C.J.S. Statutes s. 343 (words

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-08-01

Snippet: See, e.g., Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1966); AGO 76-203. It would not appear

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-04-17

Snippet: , 1982); Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966). And see, subsection (2) of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1984-08-21

Snippet: possible. Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1966), citing 82 C.J.S. Statutes s

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1983-10-26

Snippet: possible. Pinellas County v. Wolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966). Thus it seems clear that the

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1983-08-12

Snippet: which to request a formal hearing. Section 455.217(2), F.S. (1982 Supp.), requires each regulatory board

International Travel Card, Inc. v. R. C. Hasler, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-02-09

Citation: 411 So. 2d 215, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19150

Snippet: for hearing motions to dissolve the garnishment. *217(2) On motion by defendant served within 20 days after

Tillis v. United Parts, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-03-25

Citation: 395 So. 2d 618

Snippet: (1948); News-Journal Corporation v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941); Hackley v. Oltz, 105 So.2d 20

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1980-05-13

Snippet: possible. See Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966); see also State Department of