Florida Statute 217.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 217
SURPLUS PROPERTY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 217.02

217.02 Definitions.—As used in this act, the term:

(1) “Department” means the Department of Management Services.

(2) “Surplus property” means any federal property which has been declared excess by a federal agency, including the Department of Defense, and made available for procurement and distribution in the state in compliance with the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, and subsequent amendments thereto, or any other federal law provided for the procurement and distribution of federal excess and surplus property.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-173; ss. 22, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 49, ch. 71-377; s. 162, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 30, ch. 94-226.

F.S. 217.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 217.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 217.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 217.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 217.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 217.02

Total Results: 20

JASON HASSAN BAXTER vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-10-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Fla. Stat. (2019). Under section 581.217(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2021), “[

Fernandez v. Basil Yates, M.D., P.A.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-06-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 3d 141, 2014 WL 2756526, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9225

Snippet: citing News-Journal Corporation v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941)), the Court observed “the drastic

Delong v. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-05-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 3d 123, 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 700, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8115, 2014 WL 2199805

Snippet: dismissed at the agency head’s discretion. § 110.217(2) Fla. Stat. An employee on probationary status attains…probationary period in his or her current position. § 110.217(2) Fla. Stat. At oral argument, Delong conceded that…probationary FWC employee, not a permanent one. § 110.217(2) Fla. Stat.7 The dissent suggests that this Court…manifested in the plain language of Section 110.217(2), Florida Statutes, requiring employees to complete… that the statutory construction of Section 110.217(2) manifested in the rule is clearly erroneous. The

Hunt v. Hooper

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-12-11T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 996 So. 2d 940

Snippet: renumbered effective July 1, 2007, see ch. 2006-217, §§ 2, 48, 49, Laws of Fla., now appears in section

Grandini v. Carizo

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-02-01T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 891 So. 2d 1216

Snippet: Fla.1949); News-Journal Corp. v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941); Bochterle v. Florida Milk Co.

Sutton v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-07-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 718 So. 2d 215

Snippet: determine with any certainty upon which of *217 the two theories the jury relied in convicting [the defendant

Standard Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1994-05-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 636 So. 2d 502

Snippet: established in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.217. 2. The committee recommends a new instruction on

Cohen v. Hattaway

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-02-06T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 595 So. 2d 105

Snippet: opportunity. News-Journal Corporation v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941); Pan American Trading &amp

Wackenhut Corp. v. Lippert

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-10-29T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 591 So. 2d 215

Snippet: elsewhere before or after the passenger's trip. *217 2) Exclusions From Liability e) DL is not responsible

Uvanile v. Denoff

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-07-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 495 So. 2d 1177

Snippet: cites News-Journal Corporation v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941). Farber acknowledged the doctrine

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-01-15T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: And see, Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1966). Thus, it appears that the Legislature

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1985-12-15T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: possible. Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1966), citing 82 C.J.S. Statutes s

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1985-09-09T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: See also, Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966); 82 C.J.S. Statutes s. 343 (

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1985-08-01T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: See, e.g., Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1966); AGO 76-203. It would not appear

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1985-04-16T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: ., 1982); Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966). And see, subsection (2) of

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1984-08-21T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: possible. Pinellas County v. Woolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1966), citing 82 C.J.S. Statutes s

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1983-10-26T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: possible. Pinellas County v. Wolley, 189 So.2d 217 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966). Thus it seems clear that the

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1983-08-12T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: which to request a formal hearing. Section 455.217(2), F.S. (1982 Supp.), requires each regulatory board…of s 119.07(3)(c), F.S. (1982 Supp.), and ss 455.217(2) and 455.229, F.S., I am compelled to conclude that…boards' role in the review process, see, 455.217(2), F.S., and the legislative delegation of the boards…. I cannot agree with your assertion that ss455.217(2) and 455.229 allow the department to hold closed…1) the examination review provided for by s 455.217(2) is limited to the examined and cannot be extended

International Travel Card, Inc. v. R. C. Hasler, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-02-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 411 So. 2d 215, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19150

Snippet: for hearing motions to dissolve the garnishment. *217(2) On motion by defendant served within 20 days after

Tillis v. United Parts, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-03-24T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 395 So. 2d 618

Snippet: 1948); News-Journal Corporation v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217, 2 So.2d 741 (1941); Hackley v. Oltz, 105 So.2d 20