Florida Statute 218.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 218
FINANCIAL MATTERS PERTAINING TO POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 218.02

218.02 Disposition of unused funds relating to the refunding of bonds.—

(1) All funds heretofore or hereafter raised or created by any county or taxing district for the purpose of applying toward the payment of interest or principal of refunding bonds of such county or taxing district, when such refunding bonds are not issued and such funds not otherwise lawfully disposed of, shall revert back to the county or special taxing district to be used by the governing body or board of such county or taxing district for such general and lawful purposes of the county or taxing district raising such funds as in the judgment and discretion of such governing body or board shall seem to the best interest of the county or taxing district.

(2) For the purpose of carrying out the intent of this section, every officer or board, now or hereafter having the custody of any of the said funds shall transmit and return the same to the governing body or board of the county or taxing district, taking receipt therefor from such governing body or board.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 15907, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 1365(4).

F.S. 218.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 218.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 218.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 218.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 218.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 218.02

Total Results: 9

GRANT SAMPSON MOORE vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-10-21

Snippet: County, Florida, Chapter 218, Article 1, section 218.2 (2022). We remand these cases back to the trial

Ey v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-02-28

Citation: 982 So. 2d 618, 2008 WL 516396

Snippet: discretion to deny relief. Green, 944 So.2d at 218. [2] Petitioner's postconviction motion also alleged

Department of Transp. v. Winter Park Golf Club

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-02-18

Citation: 687 So. 2d 970, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1374, 1997 WL 70902

Snippet: hours found to be reasonable by the trial court (218.2 hours) results in a corrected figure of 168.3 hours

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Malmberg

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-07-07

Citation: 639 So. 2d 615, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 359, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 1001, 1994 WL 318468

Snippet: the offer rejected." The trial judge awarded $5,218.02 in costs, but denied attorney fees. On appeal,

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Malmberg

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-07-30

Citation: 623 So. 2d 755, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7928, 1993 WL 284653

Snippet: Civil Procedure 1.442, and which awarded it $5,218.02 in costs under the prevailing party statute.1 State

Alanco v. Bystrom

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-21

Citation: 544 So. 2d 217, 1989 WL 24044

Snippet: than all other property in Dade County, Florida. *218 (2) The Defendant [Property Appraiser] did not use

Hockensmith v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-04-13

Citation: 524 So. 2d 462, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1560, 1988 WL 32907

Snippet: (1985),1 and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.218,2 the hospital filed a report in which the appellant’s

Alachua County v. Reddick

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-03-20

Citation: 368 So. 2d 653

Snippet: isolated dicta in Davis v. Sails, supra, 318 So.2d at 218:[2] The test as to the validity of a zoning ordinance

Courtney v. Warner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-02-22

Citation: 290 So. 2d 101

Snippet: City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.App. 1973, 286 So.2d 218. [2] The reasons for such deduction were set forth