Florida Statute 250.18 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XVII
MILITARY AFFAIRS AND RELATED MATTERS

Chapter 250
MILITARY AFFAIRS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 250.18

250.18 Commissioned officers and warrant officers; clothing and uniform allowance.—Each commissioned officer and warrant officer of the Florida National Guard must provide his or her own uniform, as prescribed under Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force regulations for commissioned or warrant officers of the National Guard or officers of the Army or Air Force of the United States, of like grade and office.

History.—s. 41, ch. 8502, 1921; s. 6, ch. 9337, 1923; s. 4(e), ch. 12089, 1927; CGL 2053(e); s. 4, ch. 14761, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2039(1); s. 1, ch. 25112, 1949; s. 1, ch. 91-139; s. 16, ch. 2003-68.

Note.—Former s. 250.30.

F.S. 250.18 on Google Scholar

F.S. 250.18 on Casetext

Amendments to 250.18

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 250.18

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 250.18.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 250.18

Total Results: 4

Smith v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-12-30

Citation: 917 So. 2d 400, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20542, 2005 WL 3555852

Snippet: years old and had assets valued in excess of $191,250.18.1 When the petition was filed, Smith was apparently

National Institute of Agrarian Reform v. Kane

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-05-14

Citation: 153 So. 2d 40

Snippet: own territory." Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 18 S.Ct. 83, 42 L.Ed. 456 (1897). This appears to

In Re Parker's Estate

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-03-19

Citation: 110 So. 2d 498

Snippet: Boston v. Charlton, 1932, 281 Mass. 72, 183 N.E. 250. [18] In re McFerren's Estate, 1950, 365 Pa. 490,

Bloxham v. Consumers' Electric Light & Street Railroad

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-06-15

Citation: 36 Fla. 519

Snippet: New York City & Northern R. R. Co., 110 N. Y. 250, 18 N. E. Rep. 92, the converse of the proposition