Florida Statute 256.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XVIII
PUBLIC LANDS AND PROPERTY

Chapter 256
FLAGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 256.10

256.10 Mutilation of or disrespect for Confederate flags or replicas.—No person shall publicly mutilate, deface, defile, defy, trample upon, or by word or act cast contempt upon the flags of the Confederacy, or replicas thereof, for crass or commercial purposes; provided however nothing contained herein shall be construed to prevent or prohibit the use of such flags for decorative or patriotic purposes.

History.—s. 1, ch. 61-115.

F.S. 256.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 256.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 256.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 256.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 256.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 256.10

Total Results: 5

Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. Warfel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-01-26

Citation: 82 So. 3d 47, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 50, 2012 WL 224104, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 195

Snippet: section 90.304-.... ” (emphasis supplied)); § 409.256(10)(d), Fla. Stat. (2010) (“For purposes of this section

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1983-03-29

Snippet: 334 So.2d 594 (Fla. 1976). I also note that s616.256(10) empowers the Authority to adopt, pursuant toChapter

DaCosta v. Dibble

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 225

Snippet: abandoned his appeal. Ellsworth v. Haile, 29 Fla. 256, 10 South. Rep. 612. In Baker v. Chatfield, 23 Fla

Barton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1901-06-15

Citation: 43 Fla. 477

Snippet: 541, 55 N. W. Rep. 461; Jones v. State, 67 Md. 256, 10 Atl. Rep. 216; Thomas v. Abbott, 105 Mich. 687

Christopher v. Newnham

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1894-06-15

Citation: 34 Fla. 370

Snippet: South. Rep., 854; Ellsworth vs. Haile, 29 Fla., 256, 10 South. Rep., 612. Plaintiffs in error have, during