Florida Statute 292.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XX
VETERANS

Chapter 292
VETERANS' AFFAIRS; SERVICE OFFICERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 292.10

292.10 Local governing bodies authorized to assist war veterans; powers.—The board of county commissioners of each county and the governing body of each city in the state are hereby granted full and complete power and authority to aid and assist wherever practical and feasible the veterans, male and female, who have served in the Armed Forces of the United States in any war and received an honorable discharge from any branch of the military service of the United States, and their dependents, in presenting claims for and securing such compensation, hospitalization, education, loans, career training, and other benefits or privileges to which said veterans, or any of them, are or may become entitled under any federal or state law or regulation by reason of their service in the Armed Forces of the United States.

History.—s. 1, ch. 23017, 1945; s. 4, ch. 77-330; s. 25, ch. 2004-357.

F.S. 292.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 292.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 292.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 292.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 292.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 292.10

Total Results: 11

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-05-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 115 So. 3d 286, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 337, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1944, 2013 WL 2248756

Snippet: admonition shall be given to all children in all cases. *292(10) That, if the child pleads guilty or nolo contendere

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1994-02-15T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: to the claimant. To further assist veterans, s. 292.10, Fla. Stat. (1993), grants to each board of county…against its being done in any other way). 4 Section 292.10, Fla. Stat. (1993). 5 38 U.S.C. § 5502

E.M. Scott Contractors v. Baker

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-12-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 479 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2713, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17257

Snippet: Barfield, Ervin, Joanos 10 December 1985 479 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2713, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17257

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1985-11-19T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: -related long distance telephone calls. Section 292.10, F.S., authorizes the board of county commissioners

Maceda v. Duhig

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-07-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 474 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1679, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15420

Snippet: Bas, Hendry, Kin, Nesbitt 9 July 1985 474 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1679, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15420

Ingram v. Ingram

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-02-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 466 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 486, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12547

Snippet: Edward, Man, Ott, Ret 22 February 1985 466 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 486, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12547

In Re Rules of Crim. Proc.(sent. Guidelines)

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1983-09-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 439 So. 2d 848

Snippet: ----------------------| | 255-292 | 10 | |

Florida Bar v. Gallagher

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1978-12-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 366 So. 2d 397

Snippet: reprimand to Respondent. Costs in the amount of $292.10 are hereby taxed against the Respondent. It is

COUCH CONST. CO., INC. v. Department of Transp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1978-06-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 361 So. 2d 184

Snippet: county."); Schulte v. Salt Lake City, 79 Utah 292, 10 P.2d 625 (1932)(successful bidder had previously

Boymer v. Birmelin

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1969-10-21T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 227 So. 2d 358

Snippet: Shockney v. Marsh, 83 Ind. App. 407, 147 N.E. 292; 10 C.J.S. Bills and Notes § 151, at p. 623. For the

Mexico Beach Corporation v. St. Joe Paper Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1957-11-04T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 97 So. 2d 708

Snippet: So. 876; Fox v. Union Sugar Refinery, 109 Mass. 292. [10] Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co., 134 U.S. 178