Florida Statute 295.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XX
VETERANS

Chapter 295
LAWS RELATING TO VETERANS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 295.13

295.13 Disability of minority of veterans and spouse removed, benefits under Servicemen’s Readjustment Act.—The disability of minority of any person otherwise eligible for a loan, or guaranty or insurance of a loan, pursuant to chapter 37 of Title 38 U.S.C., “Home, Farm and Business Loans,” and the disability of the minor spouse of any eligible veteran, in connection with any transaction entered into pursuant to that Act of the Congress, as heretofore or hereafter amended, shall not affect the binding effect of any obligation incurred by such eligible person or spouse as an incident to any such transaction, including incurring of indebtedness and acquiring, encumbering, selling, releasing, or conveying property, or any interest therein, if all or part of any such obligation is guaranteed or insured by the United States Government or the United States Department of Veterans Affairs pursuant to such act and amendments thereto; or if the United States Department of Veterans Affairs is the creditor, by reason of a loan or a sale pursuant to such act and amendments. This section does not create, or render enforceable, any other or greater rights or liabilities than would exist if neither such person nor such spouse were a minor.

History.—s. 1, ch. 28204, 1953; s. 24, ch. 69-353; s. 18, ch. 84-114; s. 55, ch. 2020-2.

F.S. 295.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 295.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 295.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 295.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 295.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 295.13

Total Results: 3

In Re Estate of Hester

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1946-12-03

Citation: 28 So. 2d 164, 158 Fla. 170

Snippet: affirmative and rely on Roan v. Holmes, 32 Fla. 295, 13 So. 339; 21 L.R.A. 180, and Pingree v. DeHaven

Pingree v. Dehaven

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-06-17

Citation: 105 So. 147, 90 Fla. 42

Snippet: inchoate right of dower. Roan v. Holmes, 32 Fla. 295,13 South. Rep. 339. The record does not disclose when

Seedhouse v. Broward

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1894-06-15

Citation: 34 Fla. 509

Snippet: Halle, 22 Fla., 236; Roan vs. Holmes, 32 Fla., 295, 13 South., 339. Viewed as a contract, requiring the