Florida Statute 308.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXII
PORTS AND HARBORS

Chapter 308
SHIPPING MASTERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 308.02

308.02 Bond; penalties.—Before obtaining the license provided for in s. 308.03, said shipping master shall execute a bond, with two good and sufficient sureties, to be approved by the mayor, in the sum of $2,000, payable to the mayor and the mayor’s successors in office, conditioned for the honest and faithful transaction of all business appertaining to the shipping master’s office and occupation; and if any shipping master, or any other person by his or her consent, procurement, advice or connivance, shall be found guilty of harboring, concealing or enticing away any marine or seaman from a vessel, or encouraging any marine or seaman to mutiny or disobey lawful orders, he, she, or they shall, in addition to the punishment provided by law for every such offense under this chapter, forfeit for the use of the port or town for which the shipping master is appointed, not less than $100 nor more than $1,000; the cause to be tried in the proper court on complaint of the mayor or party aggrieved.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1750, 1870; RS 934; GS 1288; RGS 2458; CGL 3867; s. 276, ch. 95-148.

F.S. 308.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 308.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 308.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 308.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 308.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 308.02

Total Results: 18

In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-12-18

Citation: 154 So. 3d 301

Snippet: each of the parties as may be required by law; *308(2) take testimony and establish a record, which record

FT Investments, Inc. v. State Department of Environmental Protection

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-06-14

Citation: 93 So. 3d 369, 2012 WL 2138110, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9601

Snippet: for the “third party defense” under section 376.308(2)(d), Florida Statutes, because the petroleum contamination

General Dynamics Corp. v. Brottem

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-30

Citation: 53 So. 3d 334, 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1225, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20129, 2010 WL 5391519

Snippet: an employee or agent of the defendant....” § 376.308(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). Florida’s Workers’ Compensation

ARAMARK UNIFORM AND APPAREL v. Easton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-10-07

Citation: 894 So. 2d 20, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 551, 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20115, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1743, 2004 WL 2251847

Snippet: or omission caused the contamination. See § 376.308(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2002). The third party must be

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-07-10

Citation: 853 So. 2d 303, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 627, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1163, 2003 WL 21543753

Snippet: that may aid in the disposition of the action. *308(2) Adoption Proceedings. A case management conference

S. B. v. D.H.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-07-02

Citation: 736 So. 2d 766

Snippet: the biological father.” Privette, 617 So.2d at 308.2 Under these principles, we hold that S.B., a putative

Sb v. Dh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-07-02

Citation: 736 So. 2d 766, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11641, 1999 WL 445697

Snippet: the biological father." Privette, 617 So.2d at 308.[2] Under these principles, we hold that S.B., a putative

State, Dept. of Envir. v. Scm Glidco Org.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-10-16

Citation: 606 So. 2d 722

Snippet: entity who has been trained as provided in s. 455.308(2); 2. Supervised by an employee who has met the training

Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-03-01

Citation: 558 So. 2d 93, 1990 WL 19935

Snippet: cause of action shall be those specified in s. 376.308.[[2]] We find no basis for holding the above-quoted

City of Temple Terrace v. HILLSBOROUGH ASS'N, ETC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-10-10

Citation: 322 So. 2d 571, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18792

Snippet: Village of Ridgewood, 1958, 26 N.J. 578, 141 A.2d 308; 2 Anderson, American Law of Zoning § 9.05 (1968)

Bamber v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-08-02

Citation: 300 So. 2d 269

Snippet: of the motion. NOTES [1] (Fla. 1956) 90 So.2d 308. [2] See also, Rules 3.691, CrPR, and 6.15, F.A.R

Montclair Homes, Inc. v. Thompson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-02-21

Citation: 138 So. 2d 305

Snippet: Company v. Simpkins, Fla., 99 So.2d 557, 561. *308“ ‘[2, 3] Medical opinion should follow this same rule

American Surety Co. of New York v. Gedney

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-01-20

Citation: 185 So. 844, 136 Fla. 10, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1518

Snippet: Dec. 748, 6 Paige Ch. 88; Harris v. Clap, 1 Mass. 308, 2 Am. Dec. 27; American Surety Company of New York

Whitfield v. Whitfield

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-02-10

Citation: 172 So. 711, 127 Fla. 74

Snippet: sustained by authority. 1 Story Ed. Jur. No. 307, 308; 2 Pom. Eq. Jur. No. 948, 951, 955, 956, 958, 1088;

Callison v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-12-20

Citation: 82 Fla. 516, 90 So. 619

Snippet: Savannah, Florida, etc. Ry. Co. v. Clark, 23 Fla. 308, 2 South. Rep. 667; Benbow v. Marquis & Co., 17 Fla

Bond Lumber Co. v. Masland

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 188

Snippet: material man. Boisot on Mech. Liens, Sec. 314, p. 308; 2 Jones on Liens, Sec. 1469; Phillips on Mech. Liens

Webster v. Wailes

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-01-15

Citation: 35 Fla. 267

Snippet: Savannah, Florida & Western Ry. Co. vs. Clark, 23 Fla. 308, 2 South. 667. In that case the defendant appellant

Branch v. Wilson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1868-07-01

Citation: 12 Fla. 543

Snippet: O’Neal, 2 Sneed, 442; Leinan vs. Smart, 11 Humph., 308; 2 Stark. Ev., 551-5. The consideration of the note